Отзывы на Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike от Dmitry Selivanov
Отзывы TSiAh
4 737 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Jacob, день назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от aUser, 6 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от petethecanuck, 6 дней назадgreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Sweet Citrus, 6 дней назад[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 17708027, 9 дней назадПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Zelgadis-San, 11 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Juraj Mäsiar, 15 дней назадThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13519206, 16 дней назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18900251, 16 дней назадThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Ответ разработчика
размещено 16 дней назадI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Riku70X, 20 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от malisipi, 20 дней назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от placidtea, 21 день назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Spigot, 21 день назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Dale Cooper, 22 дня назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18909402, 22 дня назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Kiwi18, 23 дня назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 15889624, 24 дня назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Cameron Owens, 25 дней назадI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 24 дня назадGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Оценено на 1 из 5от kuroten, месяц назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Nicky McCurdy, месяц назадThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18144459, месяц назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19547104, месяц назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от qawas, месяц назадStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Ответ разработчика
размещено месяц назадMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 6120711, месяц назадasking for premium for such a simple addon
Ответ разработчика
размещено месяц назадMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Оценено на 2 из 5от Chantelle, месяц назадThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.