от Пользователь Firefox 17222580, 4 месяца назад
Оценено на 5 из 5
Ich bin sehr zufrieden. Läuft stabil und macht was es verspricht. Das manche Anbieter diese Adressen blockieren, ist verständlich. Aber meist funktioniert es. Weiter so.
- от engrsam, 12 дней назадОценено на 1 из 5Extension doesn't work. I have Relay Premium giving me unlimited aliases, however, when I attempt to use it, I'm presented with two options, generate new masks, get unlimited masks. Clicking on generate new mask does nothing. Even after clicking it multiple times. It does this on different websites. Only way to get a new mask is to navigate to the Relay website, generate one there and then go back to the website I want to use it with. Not very convenient.
- от BobbyB, 14 дней назадОценено на 2 из 5The relay address does not show as valid on email validators. eg: ipqualityscore dot com lists it as invalid and disposable even though it does get forwarded.
The problem does not lie with ipqualityscore dot com. The problem is with the service which validates the email. Here is the conversation using another validator called centralops dot net.
The address was rejected!
How is any email validating service suppose to reply but "invalid"? "Disposable" email is a judgement call.
OK, I use the free service so I can't complain but I were to contemplate getting the paid version there is not much incentive to do so if the email will check out as invalid.
[Resolving inbound-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws . com...]
[Contacting inbound-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws . com [188.8.131.52]...]
220 inbound-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws . com ESMTP Amazon SES 57hYwRshE5b3rLPo7WvO
EHLO mx1.validemail . com
250-inbound-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws . com
550 5.7.1 TLS required by recipient
[Address has been rejected]