Отзывы на Nightly Tester Tools
Nightly Tester Tools от Automation Development, Henrik Skupin, xabolcs, Kohei Yoshino
Ответ Automation Development
Ответ разработчика
опубликовано 5 лет назадThank you for the review. Also those are helpful information in how we can make NTT a better extension. Would you mind to file those as new issues in our issue tracker on github? We would kinda appreciate it, and make sure that it will be included in one of the future releases.
The issue tracker can be found here: https://github.com/mozilla/nightlytt/issues
Thanks.
The issue tracker can be found here: https://github.com/mozilla/nightlytt/issues
Thanks.
27 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от FL45PU-, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Sullivan Moore, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 16974402, год назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от CGC, 2 года назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Critt, 2 года назадUseless. Does not integrate into the tools menu and therefore you have no access to anything within this add-on.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Lara, 2 года назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Sergio, 2 года назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от cgc, 3 года назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Paul B, 3 года назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от kriztmark, 3 года назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от CASANOVA, 3 года назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Phillip, 3 года назадIf you want to copy something that you wouldn't normally want to, this is the extension for you.
WebExtensionAPI has pretty much sent everything else down the loo. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14474607, 4 года назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от PERCE-NEIGE, 4 года назадI used this one for "force addon compatibility". Missing greatly.
Ответ разработчика
опубликовано 4 года назадPlease see https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nightly-tester-tools/reviews/1095111/, where we already described why it's not needed anymore. Where exactly do you have problems?
If that fixes your problem please reconsider the rating of the extension. Thanks. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14242224, 4 года назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14137740, 4 года назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от axtual, 4 года назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13910128, 4 года назадHow can i use "Force Addon Compatibility"...
Ответ разработчика
опубликовано 4 года назадJust in short this feature is not necessary anymore since Firefox 57 when only extensions based on the WebExtension API are allowed in Firefox. As such it has been removed.
If you have problems with a feature you should contact the support site or send an email instead of writing negative reviews on AMO. We would be happy if you could adjust your rating. Thanks. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Michal Stanke, 4 года назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от OneLag, 5 лет назадSadly it doesn't work anymore to force addons compatibility =(
- Оценено на 4 из 5от grahamperrin, 5 лет назадI'll use this occasionally with Waterfox.
More generally – for any Firefox-like browser – identifying extensions primarily by name is troublesome. Because addons.mozilla.org (AMO) too often makes it unnecessarily difficult to find by name; because developers too often use multiple names for a single product; and so on – so I can't give five stars.
The extension could be improved by more positively identifying extensions. Include:
- either the AMO address of the extension, non-localised, for example https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/nightly-tester-tools/
- or (if not listed on AMO) ideally the support URL, less ideally the home URL.
If no URLs is associated with the extension, be explicit about the absence of a support URL.Ответ разработчика
опубликовано 5 лет назадThank you for the review. Also those are helpful information in how we can make NTT a better extension. Would you mind to file those as new issues in our issue tracker on github? We would kinda appreciate it, and make sure that it will be included in one of the future releases.
The issue tracker can be found here: https://github.com/mozilla/nightlytt/issues
Thanks. - Оценено на 4 из 5от Kot, 5 лет назадIs "disable addon compatibility checking" feature still there? Can't find it anymore.