Отзывы на HTTPS+ Checker
HTTPS+ Checker от Beu
7 отзывов
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14134753, 7 лет назадSometimes it works, sometimes it does not for the same URL. Not stable at all. Plugin seems to work ok for getting the results, it is the site that sends the results that has the problems and needs to be updated.
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Dewman, 7 лет назадTo Aelisya and bigon, if you have Extension source viewer you can see (Firefox user 13857193)s code. This isn't spyware and does connects to securely... https://httpspluschecker.virtit.fr
CODE:
if (url.protocol === "http:" || url.protocol === "https:") {
console.log("onGot : " + API)
var host = url.hostname;
xhr.open('GET', API + host, false);
xhr.send();
The addon does what it says and is safe! - Оценено на 1 из 5от bigon, 7 лет назадBe aware that this module contacts an external non-https server to do the validation, this is a big no-no for me as this will lead to information being leaked.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 7 лет назадThere is a 301 redirect to https. You can change it in a "preferences" page of this addon. The default parameter will be changed at the next release :) Ответ разработчика
размещено 7 лет назадIn the "preferences" page of the extension :)
otherwise here: https://git.virtit.fr/VirtIT/wext-httpspluschecker- Оценено на 5 из 5от suffix, 7 лет назадExcellent addition! Unfortunately there are not enough websites on which all 4 squares green :)
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Bob Smith, 7 лет назадI've been looking for a replacement for CZ.NIX Labs' DNSSEC/TLSA Validator, which I still use in Cyberfox.
For Firefox Quantum, I found Popineau's DNSSEC unsatisfactory at least until the promised DNS over HTTPS (DoH) service is fulfilled at which point I'll re-evaluate. But it's been three months since their last update...
So, upon an icon click, HTTPS+ Checker queries a server (port 443) in France and presents a color coded result to the four fields.
As such, and given its experimental nature, the ability, validity and security of this extension must rest upon the user's confidence in AMZG_Beu's expertise, methodology and strategy. And, of course, that of Mozilla's vetting.
At this point I can't find reason to doubt that confidence and give five stars for effort, implementation and apparent efficacy.
I look forward to continued development and success. Good luck and thank you.