- Avaliado em 5 de 5After upgrade this Add-on is not working.
This add-on is very useful, expecting the fixes soon.
Please Fix it ASAP.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5It dosn't work with Version 46.0.1 of firefox :(
- Avaliado em 5 de 5It's a really good tool, which currently doesn't work with FF 46 (Send doesn't do anything anymore).
- Avaliado em 1 de 5With FF, RestClient no longer works. Pressing the SEND button does nothing and there seems to be no recovery from this.
- Avaliado em 4 de 5Please fix.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5Before Firefox 46 everything was ok, but now it's not working, nothing happens when I click on "Send" button
- Avaliado em 4 de 5Not working in FF 46.0 version
- Avaliado em 5 de 5Really love it! Does what is states in a simple way
- Avaliado em 1 de 5This projects looks unfortunately abandoned; stopped working in Firefox >46
- Avaliado em 5 de 5I have no idea why those last two reviews are so negative, but this helped me out in testing with a vendor that suddenly decided to move to a REST API with only a few weeks notice.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5Some months ago I wrote this rating, giving only 1 star. Since then Firefox evolved and the most annoying bug vanished:
[stroke]When I add a OAuth key the first time, I have to remove the modal overlay manually using developer tools.[/stroke]
Most bugs still persist:
Editing behaviour of request body text field is unexpected:
You click in the field and the box grows in size, reflowing text. Then it annoys you further, by selecting the whole text, instead of letting the cursor just be.
If you type in the URL field, it suggests previous URLs (coming from the browser, not addon). Good! When you navigate with the arrow keys to the desired item and press Enter, the request is directly sent. Bad!
Animations are really slow and distracting.
In the header dropdown, you don't see all of the content, e.g. there is an entry "Content-Type: appli…" and another entry "Content-Type: appli…". ╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
Today, when I added an OAuth key, deleted it and added another one, it sent the request with the previous key. FML
I wrote previously:
"This addon was never finished and died a year ago. It seems the developer lost interest, given it was incarnated ca. 4 years ago and last commit is 1 year ago."
This still holds true.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5nice. this has more sophisticated features i need.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5For all the people who need PATCH method, just click on the 'Method' dropdown list and instead of choosing from the list of existing methods, start typing in the box. It's a combo box and it will allow you to type PATCH as the name of the method and you're good to go.
It would be nice though if developer would add PATCH method to the list of default methods.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5Needs PATCH method!!!!! It's good for all the other http methods, but there's no PATCH support! And with more and more applications becoming ReSTful, and with frameworks like spring 4 / boot and other scaffolding-based frameworks, PATCH is a standard method for updating an entity. I will be using a different rest client until this one is fixed to support PATCH
- Avaliado em 4 de 5Please add PATCH command to the REST client.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5Muy bueno
- Avaliado em 3 de 5One small thing came up my mind to bother me about RESTClient add-on is that can't render "Response Body (Preview)" when HTML returned from server. There is a small negative left padding exists somehow. Except that bug, it's flawless.
Update: Rating decreased 5 stars to 3 stars due to a few bugs/inabilities;
* You can't add more than one headers properly.
* No raw view for HTTP request (as Medlock Perlman mentioned below).
I hope developer will consider these comments for next release.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5How to load old requests? I always type all content for once using it. They should be listed to select from history?
- Avaliado em 5 de 5I've used a couple of chrome plugins as well. This one is neat and professional compared to those. Does the job very neat.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5SOAP, REST and simple HTTP-request.
Custom message body. Very nice! Thanks for you addon!
- Avaliado em 2 de 5Great addin but unfortunately it's dead for a long time even being open sourced.
- Avaliado em 4 de 5I can handle all my use cases
- Avaliado em 1 de 5I don't take the time to write reviews often. But I literally created an account so I can tell you NOT TO DOWNLOAD THIS.
I stupidly wasted a day chasing bugs that just happened to be resulting from this terrible extension.
Seriously, download SoapUI if you want reliable web service testing. You're way better off.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5Poor usability and minimal documentation make it difficult to be sure you're formatting the request properly. There's also no facility to see the raw HTTP request.
This can mean you're wasting a lot of time chasing imaginary bugs. Avoid this abware like the plague.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5Good (enough) features, bad usability (XUL-based version was better), unfixed bugs. Sadly, this project seems to be dead.