Beoordelingen voor Smart Referer
Smart Referer door meh., Erin Schlarb
Beoordeling door tama
Waardering: 5 van 5
door tama, 3 jaar geledenThanks for great addon!
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
75 beoordelingen
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Lucas S., één jaar geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 14234915, één jaar geledenPlease update the whitelist
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-optional - Waardering: 5 van 5door Bryan Hoang, 2 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 3 van 5door kcufuoyeid, 2 jaar geledenIt works for me, for the most part. I saw my firewall logs and somebody else mentioned some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
It's crazy to have such checking for updates every startup at 24 hour internals with no way to change this is a bit excessive. I disabled whitelist. downloaded the whitelist , modified it to my own liking and stored it as a local file. This add-on would be vastly improved it had a easier to use and more intuitive interface for managing websites if they break. Last update was 3 years ago so I guess that's it for this add-on. - Waardering: 2 van 5door rocksoccer, 2 jaar geledenIt kind of does its job, but as many other reviews mentioned, whitelist is really such a bad idea for most people and most usage scenarios.
I only want to modify the referers for a particular website and that's all. Blacklist will be much better. I know it is not as so-called safe as whitelist, but it will become suitable for much more people. - Waardering: 5 van 5door Artyom, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Aa, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Wojox, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door odysseus, 3 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door Novakof, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 1 van 5door まさきん, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 16037335, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Mofiac, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 13541847, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 14392904, 4 jaar geledenIs it really required to use dweb infrastructure to get a tiny whitelist file? My FF shooting a bunch of requests to some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
I thought I've got a malware when I saw that in my log files.
And it takes half an hour to figure out the source of suspicious web traffic. - Waardering: 5 van 5door Anton, 4 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Сырное, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 15254132, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 1 van 5door _ztv, 5 jaar geledenРасширение давно не работает, хватит звездочки ему ставить. Да и белый список давно не обновлялся.
- Waardering: 1 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 13386478, 5 jaar geledenDoesn't seem to work. Simple settings in the FF's about:config work, however.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 13864526, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door GammaGate, 5 jaar geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 12338472, 5 jaar geleden