Omtaler for SingleFile
SingleFile av gildas
Omtale av Firefox-bruker 15950945
Vurdert til 3 ut av 5
av Firefox-bruker 15950945, 4 år sidenGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
Utviklerrespons
postet 4 år sidenI was able to save this page without any particular issue with the default settings. It weights 67MB though. Please follow this procedure if you really want me to help you: https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile#troubleshooting-unknown-issues
I also strongly recommend that you contact me or create a new issue on GitHub. You shouldn't post bug reports or support requests in the reviews because that's the rule, but also because it's not practical since the reviews aren't designed for that.
Edit: As it's not a bug report and I can't reproduce this bug anyway, I can't fix it. Thus, I recommend you to use "UnMHT" on Firefox 56 or "Save Page WE". Thank you for your review Firefox user 15950945.
I also strongly recommend that you contact me or create a new issue on GitHub. You shouldn't post bug reports or support requests in the reviews because that's the rule, but also because it's not practical since the reviews aren't designed for that.
Edit: As it's not a bug report and I can't reproduce this bug anyway, I can't fix it. Thus, I recommend you to use "UnMHT" on Firefox 56 or "Save Page WE". Thank you for your review Firefox user 15950945.
823 omtaler
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 16233407, 17 timer siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Tuana, én dag siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av JT, 5 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av pnhan, 6 dager sidenQuick and easy way to save webpages without losing its content and styles.
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av franc, 7 dager siden
- Vurdert til 1 ut av 5av Thomas, 7 dager siden
- Vurdert til 4 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 16811203, 14 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av kstephane, 14 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av AkaneAngele, 16 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av fpaupier, 17 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 14083114, 18 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Edgar, 19 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av fen, 21 dager sidenthis should honestly be standard in browsers. it's perfectly executed here
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Marti, 22 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 16779275, 23 dager siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Sam, én måned sidenDownloaded web pages are smaller in storage size than the traditional "Save this page as" feature available in browsers.
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 13016245, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 14018447, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av frostbyte, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av GradualSamurai, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 4 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 15942191, én måned siden相同的文件,如:维基百科中文词条“电子计算机”,在不同的操作系统Firefox Beta浏览器使用“SingleFile”插件下载的文件大小分别如下:
Android版 1093KB
Windows10版 630KB
安卓版比视窗版下载的文件大了1093-630=463KB,不知道是什么原因?
注:是在同1小时段下载的,SingleFile的设置也相同。 - Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Tango, én måned siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Firefox-bruker 18336652, 2 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av Matthew, 2 måneder siden
- Vurdert til 5 ut av 5av mehrdad550, 2 måneder siden