Super Agent - Automatic cookie consent에 대한 리뷰
Super Agent - Automatic cookie consent 제작자: Super Agent
리뷰 137개
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19414301 님, 한 시간 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19044236 님, 한 시간 전
- 5점 만점에 2점jesusjimsa 님, 2시간 전The extension itself works fine, but they have started charging for it.
Initially, it was completely free on both iOS and desktop. After that, they started charging on iOS after three pop-ups were blocked, but said that desktop would remain free.
However, I've just received a message from the extension saying that they will also only allow three blocks per day on desktop.
Consent-O-Matic is completely free, works just as well (or even better) most of the time, and is open source.
The daily messages telling me to pay on iOS were annoying; I won't put up with them on desktop either. It was nice while it lasted, but I'm going to uninstall it.
If you're OK with paying, go for it — it's a fine extension. Otherwise, just install Consent-O-Matic. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13897011 님, 2시간 전Used to be free and decided to swap to subscription based. Does not advertise that it is sub based.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19185659 님, 2시간 전This USED to be a free plugin. Sadly, the developer has decided to chase money and remove all utility from the free version, with it only working "up to 3 times a day", otherwise asking for ~$10 per month. So, instead I will be uninstalling.
If you are reading this and haven't enabled automatic updates for plugins, then MAKE SURE TO DISABLE THEM!.
Louis Rossmann was right.개발자 답글
2시간 전에 게시됨Hi, the extension costs 1$ a month. Not 10$. You can also downgrade if you don't want to pay the subscription. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 19413785 님, 8시간 전Sadly, a case study as to why to not enable automatic updates. Clippy and Louis Rossmann would be sad. Created an account to review due to recent changes.
I will give the author credit where it is due, he seems to be updating the extension regularly. It's now on version 3.31 and as far as I can tell, the subscription wording was added back 3.29, and I've since downgraded to 3.28 and will leave it there until I find a replacement. I will also give the author credit for creating a popup to let me know as I hadn't realized it had stopped working. And I learned that downgrading an extension is a built in feature of Firefox.
The only other extension I know that charges is PushBullet, but their free option is quite more generous than '3 times a day.' I also rather look at it that something has changed for the developer as he now feels he needs funds and hope things turn out well for him. It's easier to think that, than something like he just got greedy. Or maybe it's better the other way around?
For what it claims, it seems to do what is says. Only had some issues with locally hosted sites, but the blacklist feature is useful enough for that.
Edit:
Updated to 2 stars due to friendly developer response. I cannot go farther than that because they change the extension after the fact. Would have no issue if it was like that from the start. It's unfortunate because I see where the developer is coming from (as a programmer myself) and I understand the thought process, but can't support the act. If you see this Francisco, I thank you for your offer, but I'll have to refuse on principle.개발자 답글
3시간 전에 게시됨Hi
Thanks for the fair and detailed review. Happy to offer you a year long license. I am also glad to know its possible to downgrade as I understand maybe not everyone will be willing to pay, and that way you have a solution. Unfortunately we are two people working almost full time here, and for this to be viable we need to charge a subscription. I don't think 1$ is greedy or unfair, but if people don't like it they can downgrade or stop using it.
Best regards
Francisco - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 14559047 님, 8시간 전Oh, thinking of making a funtune off "donations" then made very little, turns on the pay wall and blame others for not being nice.
How standard.
Leave.
Now.개발자 답글
3시간 전에 게시됨Hi
Unfortunately we are two people working almost full time here, and for this to be viable we need to charge a subscription. I don't think 1$ is greedy or unfair, but if people don't like it they can downgrade or stop using it. Im also happy to offer you a subscription.
Regards 개발자 답글
3시간 전에 게시됨Hi
Unfortunately we are two people working almost full time here, and for this to be viable we need to charge a subscription. I don't think 1$ is greedy or unfair, but if people don't like it they can downgrade or stop using it.
Best regards개발자 답글
11시간 전에 게시됨Hi, we show a pop up once every two weeks. It seems pretty fair for a free version. The free version also works 3 times a day (also seems pretty fair but open to hear your thoughts). This extension takes a lot of time to keep updated as sites are constantly changing their cookie banners. I would be happy to offer you a free year.
It makes no sense to give me a one star review simply because you don't want to pay. You can just stop using it.
Feel free to get in touch hello@super-agent.com- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13943005 님, 11시간 전
개발자 답글
11시간 전에 게시됨Hi, why is it a scam to charge for my work? This extension takes a lot of time to keep updated. I would be happy to offer you a free year. It makes no sense to give me a one star review simply because you don't want to pay. You can just stop using it.- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19280489 님, 10일 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 19095204 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 15028541 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점biggus_ivanus 님, 2달 전can confirm what another user mentioned - it basically makes youtube unusable, everything loads very slowly, nearly half a minute of waiting until the video plays when it normally takes about a second or less. any attempt to use the media controls, especially playing or pausing, are either completely unresponsive or take multiple seconds to register - again not an issue i used to have.
on top of all of this, the extension does not even do what it is meant to. it fails to detect the cookie pop-up even though the extension is enabled for the website.
this was incredibly frustrating to deal with because i (mistakenly) assumed the issue was coming from some other settings i changed in the about:config page. after resetting my profile and loading in a configured one with most of my settings, i soon figured out that the issue was super agent.
at the current state, I cannot recommend it at all, at least for firefox 140.0b9.