부가 기능
5점중 5점 받음
It's a lot lighter and faster and can do just as much as greasemonkey!
이 사용자는 이 부가 기능에 평가를 전에 작성해 놓았습니다.5점중 5점 받음
This feels lighter/faster & more stable compared to when I was using Greasemonkey on my add-on heavy FF. Thank you!
5점중 5점 받음
Nice!
5점중 5점 받음
Great Extension, Simple, easy and working, Thank you
Pease ADD RUN button to toolbar 5점중 4점 받음
I have to refesh page on ajax site to make my scripts run . Waitforkeyelements is not always work on some sites and it's hard to use.Please add run button to toolbar and hotkey for run on current page.
Awesome addon - support for Firefox versions is incorrect 5점중 5점 받음
This is a very good and useful addon and I've written extensions for a number of purposes with large followings. The most recent versions of Scriptish won't install in Pale Moon (Firefox 20.2) saying the software is not compatible with Firefox 20.2. However, if one installs an older version (say 0.1.8) and then upgrades things work just fine.
Please add execution order 5점중 4점 받음
If it's better than greasymonkey, then at least have all the features greasymonkey has at the moment
5점중 4점 받음
I can't simulate click event
Very good 5점중 5점 받음
Good fork of Greasemonkey.
Please modify the height of number icon scripts in 16 px because now is too big and change the height of the toolbar or addons-bar.
Thanks.
5점중 3점 받음
Sigh ... it will never again be compatible with Pale Moon? :(
Good addon 5점중 5점 받음
Better then GM
이 평가는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 버전 (0.1.10)에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
good instead for GM
이 평가는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 버전 (0.1.10)에 대한 것입니다.Scriptish died? 5점중 1점 받음
Many bugs and several months without any update
Give up?
Great addon, but.. 5점중 4점 받음
Great add-on from the dark era when Greasemonkey went without updates, but it needs some maintenance as it's being depreciated, Greasemonkey is catching up. I hate to see such a fast and strong script executor possibly die.
이 평가는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 버전 (0.1.8)에 대한 것입니다.5점중 1점 받음
Long overdue for an update.
이 평가는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 버전 (0.1.8)에 대한 것입니다.Nice! 5점중 5점 받음
Switched from Greasemonkey.
이 평가는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 버전 (0.1.8)에 대한 것입니다.scriptwright who's done the switch after years of greasemonkey 5점중 5점 받음
I've finally decided to try this after greasemonkey started to noticeably hang
my browser
Haven't noticed any script incompatibility issues in my first day of usage, and there's one major advantage compared to greasemonkey: it's incredibly faster! Firefox feels slick again.
The transition from greasemonkey was greatly aided by the fact that the script converts greasemonkey's config.xml directly to it's internal format, one caveat is that the script datastore isn't transferred automatically, however this can be fixed through a bit of scripting rewriting prefs.js
nanquan noted that the icon was rather unsightly. It does look windows 98-ish, but an added feature displaying the number of scripts used on the page next to the icon does make up for it somewhat. But compared to the advantages this script offers, this is a minor issue.
One problem I've noticed is the missing feature of sorting by execution order. This might come in handy for script compatibility issues with other scripts. I disagree with the reasons in the faq. If this is added scriptish would be perfect!
Old time Greasemonkey user like I was? 5점중 5점 받음
I have to admit, I'm usually a devout adherent to the old adage of: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". So if you're anything like me, naturally you're a little apprehensive about trying this one out as it's basically an alternative to Greasemonkey which you've probably used for YEARS without any problems!
So is it really worth it?
Well, all I can say is that the transition is very seamless, as they work pretty much the same way in terms of the user-experience. I really like however the added settings this add-on provides over Greasemonkey, like caching the scripts in memory for faster performance (which I don't really know if it makes that much of a difference, but still it's nice to have), added security settings, and just overall extended settings which are simply not available at all in Greasemonkey. It also features a built in editor which I found to be very nice and convenient!
The bottom line is that this is a better more optimized version of Greasemonkey, and yet works in much the same way so there's no learning curve here if you're making the switch. As a programmer myself who values such things, knowing that I'm using a more efficient optimized add-on is very satisfying.
PROS:
- No learning curve over Greasemonkey. Transition is very seamless, and works very much the same way.
- Extended settings (including security, script caching etc.) which are not available at all in Greasemonkey.
- Built in editor + more user-friendly when creating a new script!
- Faster, more optimized and efficient compared to its counterpart.
CONS:
- No import option for scripts and their related settings from Greasemonkey. So if you're using a lot of scripts you're gonna have to manually re-install them all after making the switch.
- Not very stylish! The little green scroll icon used by Scriptish is kind of old fashioned and ugly. This actually DOES make a difference to a lot of people. Greasemonkey's one is more modern and detailed which just LOOKS better. Not a make or break issue for me personally, but definitely something the add-on developers should address.
I hope you found this review helpful!
5점중 4점 받음
Underlying components are better than greasemonkey. I especially like the update function.
But it's missing a few things that are available in greasemonkey such as a mobile version and sorting in script management.
Another thing that bugs me (but it's really not a problem) is that the "active script counter" goes beyond the button area.
Change order 5점중 4점 받음
Why whe cant change order script on toolbar menu? Its sort only alphabetically, but sometimes I preffer other order - when use some script offten I put it higher. Of course I dont want change order execute because it can be done inside the script, but only reorganization in toolbar menu.
Any change to improve this option, the same what whe have it on GM - move up / move down?
