DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection에 대한 리뷰
DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection 제작자: DuckDuckGo
Firefox 사용자 18893378 님의 리뷰
5점 만점에 4점
Firefox 사용자 18893378 님, 일 년 전Not as good as Privacy Badger, only reason to use is to know safe website is which is bery handy and reason I will rate it 4 stars, but as a blocker it claims site breakage if some things are blocked which I noticed is often false so use Privacy Badger or another one that blocks even more if you do your reasearch, yes it exists although nobody tells you of course in this day and age only info is mostly lies and ai bots, so if you are human like me than keep searching for it you will eventually find it, it isn't bought out by the evil corps that love to ruin everything once good. P.S. Duckduckgo is fairly junky in terms of finding good results you will end up with tons of stuff that you didn't even search for, better off using brave or presearch because it's not owned by the evil corps that don't care about us except making money.
리뷰 2,369개
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 18205130 님, 2일 전I can't say about the rest (the search seems to work well, sometimes it searches better than Google, in rare cases it can be worse), but the email protection option is implemented extremely poorly. I can create an address @duck.com, but if I try to log into it, after logging out or if Firefox decides to logout, most often, either nothing happens after I click “Sign in”, or when I enter a set of words from the letter, an anti-bot check appears, occasionally an error something like “these words are not suitable”. This is incredibly annoying, to say that it is angry is to say nothing. This problem has not been resolved for a year, but previously everything worked. It's a shame that companies that are against GAFAM have to stay ahead of them instead of copying their worst stuff.
- 5점 만점에 4점Luís Adriano 님, 13일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19990902 님, 23일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 20180943 님, 24일 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 13622605 님, 한 달 전I always install Firefox and Duck (including Ducks Browser For more restrictive browsing, needs) as straight up first install on all devices. Unquestionably the best protection from being farmed on the internet.
Samsung farms you, Microsoft farms you, Google has your DNA, Facebook OWNs and SHAPEs your thoughts and hate. This stops all of that. So if it breaks parts of the internet, thats ok too, its called protection.
One of my friends put my email into a shopping website to get some (so called TEMU special deal). Im no longer friends with them. I have throw away shopping emails and he blew a 20year private email I use for formal emails. Thats how hard you need this.... - 5점 만점에 5점退出党团队远离中共邪教访问c88c.us 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점samirnazri 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19943899 님, 3달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19601933 님, 3달 전Comoda e veloce soprattutto per Linux in cui non é disponibile DuckDuckGo.
- 5점 만점에 3점Firefox 사용자 17017458 님, 4달 전Con l'estensione attiva non mi fa superare la verica captcha di Facebook,
in pratica mi da la verifica captcha positiva ma mi rimanda al login e questo
si ripete molte volte senza consentirmi l'accesso a Facebook.
Il problema si è presentato da 2 massimo 3 settimane, prima non avevo
nessun problema ad accedere.
Disattivando l'estensione supero positivamente la verifica captcha e posso
accedere a Facebook.
Ho aperto anche un Topic nel Forum Mozilla Italia dal titolo:
" Malfunzionamento di Firefox all'accesso in Facebook con il captcha?"
I miei dati attuali: Win 10, Firefox 152.0.1 e DuckDuckGo Search & Tracker Protection
v. 2026.5.22. - I see no point to this since we have uBlock that's not restricted like on Chrome browsers. Adding AI only makes this worse.
Overall, I'm not happy with FF in 2026 and I understand Mozilla is going to redesign/refresh FF to (try) to win users back. It sits at the bottom of browsers for desktops — then again, desktop browser use is on a major decline anyways. - 5점 만점에 1점American chestnut 님, 5달 전"Optional" AI summary is on by default. They think changing your search to a "noai" domain is a suitable work around. No it's not, we should not have disinfo brainrot on by default.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19902880 님, 6달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19885048 님, 6달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19882925 님, 6달 전