It is not necessary to be proficient in the thing that one critiques. I can be critical of a performance by a musician or of a book by an author without being required to perform better or write better than them. That is the nature of critical review.
I maintain that the watermark is unnecessary because it spoils the effect of the image and the theme, and makes the creator look self-obsessed. I've looked at many themes, and this is the only one I've seen watermarked, hence my comment. It was not nasty or intended to discourage, but made the point that the beautiful image would be enhanced without the obstruction and distraction of the watermark. It was less a "complaint" than a simple observation.
I thank the creator for inviting me to use other themes; I shall do just that. Cheers.
Update in response:
Yes it is unfortunate, I agree. I withdraw the word; perhaps it was ill-chosen. I'll replace it with: it makes the theme look like it's all about the creator, when it's not; it's meant to be all about Firefox. Does that make more sense? A themed background is no place for an advertisement, and that's what a watermark looks like. That's all I'm trying to say. I apologise for the offense.
Assegnate 3 su 5 stelle di sunny_one il June 12, 2014 Visualizza la risposta dello sviluppatore a questa recensione
relaxing and unobtrusive background
Assegnate 3 su 5 stelle di tlstory il May 24, 2014 Visualizza la risposta dello sviluppatore a questa recensione
Redlaura talked your theme up so much I had to come take a look - She was right - This is a gorgeous theme - You did a great job on it - So many people make up pretty landscapes but forget we have to be able to read through them too and don't make the fonts light or dark enough to see. Then you get a great image that you can't use...But you didn't do that - yours is very easy to read...
PS - Had to really look for that stupid watermark Sunny mentioned - Give it up Sunny - make a theme as good as this one then we'll look for watermarks on yours!
Assegnate 5 su 5 stelle di MystMaker il May 21, 2014 Visualizza la risposta dello sviluppatore a questa recensione