Se ritieni che questo componente aggiuntivo violi le politiche Mozilla sui componenti aggiuntivi o presenti dei possibili rischi di sicurezza o privacy, utilizza il seguente modulo per segnalarlo.
Attenzione: non utilizzare questo modulo per segnalare bug o richiedere nuove funzionalità; la segnalazione verrà inoltrata direttamente a Mozilla e non all’autore del componente aggiuntivo.
It seems to be fast. But I have lost all my speed dial links - and for a researcher that means a lot .... Mozilla could have given a clear warning that the previous speed dial is not compatible with Quantum and we would have saved our links.. Even the youtube tutorial by Juraj has not been helpful.
Not compatible with firefox Quantum.
Please update 57+ !!
A product by Mozilla no compatible with the latest version of it's own browser
Not compatible with firefox Quantum.
Please port this to Firefox 57.
Prima addon/extenstion Activate turbo version
By mistake I reported an issue for an extension which works perfectly well for me. I can't find a way to undo this, or send a success report instead?
I like this add-on a lot. Even with letting Legacy add-ons thought this add-on still does not show up any ware so it can be used.
Please let users know if this add-on will able to be updated or not so... we will know if will work on Firefox Nightly 57+ or not. Because if can add-on needs updated to Web Extensions to work. Thank youI like this add-on a lot.
Please let users know if this add-on will able to be updated or not so... we will know if will work on Firefox Nightly 57+ or not. Because if can add-on needs updated to and Web Extensions to work. Thank you
Curious why it isn't?
Also, identified one extension (Nimbus Screen Capture) as compatible when it isn't, and the Developer has acknowledged as such.
need update for thunderbird 52
Good, but Needs to Support Thunderbird again.
e10s isn't going away, the old way is.
webextensions aren't going away, the old way is.
This should be core to the browser extensions list and in a column that I can sort on.
This add-on isn't a nice-to-have, it's effectively an upcoming bug notifier.
Invaluable for calling out developers for not supporting e10s.
very easy to use.
I have been rebuilding FF 50.0 Add-On installations for, severally, Ubuntu® 16.04.1-LTS and Microsoft® Windows® 10 Build 1607 10.0.14393.451. This Extension has verified many of my formerly used Extensions as in need of complete redesign; the Merci_chao Extension Personal Menu, needed for UI cleanliness for some Users' needs, is not multiprocess-ready at last check, and I'll probably have a Bug to file at Launchpad to give a place to track a completely new Ubufox' construction (Package xul-ext-ubufox 3.2, a Depend for FF on Ubuntu®, is not multiprocess-ready).
Thanks so much for writing this. I was dismayed to see in about:addons after installing this that several add-ons that are very important to me don't yet support e10s, even though most of them are add-ons where you wouldn't think it'd be significant whether they're running in a single shared process or not. I'm grateful that I'll be able to track the progress my add-on collection makes towards multiprocess compatibility, and will know which developers to poke if needed.
Now we just need an add-on like this for the more terrifying impending change, the elimination of the original XPCOM and XUL add-on APIs in favor of the cross-browser WebExtensions API. That change will of course require a lot more work by devs to update their add-ons for, and reportedly the initial public version will _not_ replicate all the functionality of the old APIs.
BTW, in regards to BlackMagicZurgo's review before me, note that current public versions of Firefox disable multiprocess if you have _any_ add-ons installed, regardless of whether they're multiprocess compatible or not.
Now this add-on denotes XPCOM/XUL add-ons as well, with "LEGACY". Also, current versions of Firefox of course only disable multiprocess if multiprocess-incompatible add-ons are installed.
I'm rating this add-on 4 rather than 5 stars only because the format it uses cuts off much of the name and almost the entire description of each add-on, unless your browser window is crazy-wide. It'd be nice if the "Compatible..." / "Not compatible with multiprocess." label would start higher up, like the "LEGACY" indicator, and would wrap across two lines. Even better would be an option to have it display just a short indicator, like "MP: ✓" and "MP: X" (or "e10s" instead of "MP"), and there could be a tooltip on each one with the info spelled out and/or a key at the bottom of the page. Finally, it'd be nice to have an option to hide the "Report Issue" buttons to regain some horizontal space, since it's also possible to report issues using the add-on's toolbar button.
Add-on Compatibility Reporter mark some addons as : "Compatible with multi-process" but, however, some add-ons are actually NOT compatibles, like, say, FireGestures or Firebug (about:support report that "some addons disabled multi-process").
Tenho no meu navegador
Adds the text "Not compatible/Compatible with multiprocess" to every add-on in the manager, which is pretty ugly. Just the icon would be much better.
j'utilise FF depuis plusieurs années actuellement v48.02
Selon ce module le test sur les 23 extensions installées et maj ,16 seraient incompatibles multiprocess
c'est pas pour demain
good idea , ive just seen i have a lot of non multiprocess addons lol , even though i run ff50 everything is fine though and non of the adons makes any stress ...
what i don´t like is that you guys inject a stylesheet into the addon page ... which breaks my own stylesheet for that site .. it would be enough to just insert the icon besides the adon icon honestly !
Works really well :)
Works perfect on Firefox version 37.0.2.
It will be good if page show which addons was checked with this addon or any other default addon or function checker !
I mean for every addon which has been checked will be showed below users reviews on the right side!
This will be very helpful for other users. Firefox have alot addons which is very good and I am also very satisfied. Every user use own addon he like.... but problem is that some addons doesn`t work or they not working correct. If page show which addons work perfect will be very helpful....