Suberp tool for testing REST APIs Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

Have been using this for a couple of years now for testing our REST APIs, using POST, OAuth and JSON content, works perfectly, easy to use, best tool I came across!

Fix for Send button not working.. Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

open rest client.. Click on Restclient on the right top (next to settings)..which will load new page.. below you will find Firefox add-on (version 2.xxx) compatibility with firefox.. just click on it.. It prompts for allow on top.just click on allow and once it downloaded... install and restart the firefox.. thr u go..Sorry for my Bad english

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

It has stopped working Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

After upgrade this Add-on is not working.

This add-on is very useful, expecting the fixes soon.

Please Fix it ASAP.

Thank you.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Problem with new version Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

It dosn't work with Version 46.0.1 of firefox :(

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Great tool, unfortunately broken with FF 46 Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

It's a really good tool, which currently doesn't work with FF 46 (Send doesn't do anything anymore).

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Excellent tool I've used forever, but completely broken with FF 46.0 Peringkat 1 dari 5 bintang

With FF, RestClient no longer works. Pressing the SEND button does nothing and there seems to be no recovery from this.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

FF 46.00 Doesn't work aplying basic authorisations Peringkat 4 dari 5 bintang

Please fix.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Not working in Firefox 46 Peringkat 3 dari 5 bintang

Before Firefox 46 everything was ok, but now it's not working, nothing happens when I click on "Send" button

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Not working in FF 46.0 version Peringkat 4 dari 5 bintang

Not working in FF 46.0 version

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Great Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

Really love it! Does what is states in a simple way

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Unfortunately abandoned Peringkat 1 dari 5 bintang

This projects looks unfortunately abandoned; stopped working in Firefox >46

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Works perfectly Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

I have no idea why those last two reviews are so negative, but this helped me out in testing with a vendor that suddenly decided to move to a REST API with only a few weeks notice.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Peringkat 2 dari 5 bintang

Some months ago I wrote this rating, giving only 1 star. Since then Firefox evolved and the most annoying bug vanished:

[stroke]When I add a OAuth key the first time, I have to remove the modal overlay manually using developer tools.[/stroke]

Most bugs still persist:

Editing behaviour of request body text field is unexpected:
You click in the field and the box grows in size, reflowing text. Then it annoys you further, by selecting the whole text, instead of letting the cursor just be.

If you type in the URL field, it suggests previous URLs (coming from the browser, not addon). Good! When you navigate with the arrow keys to the desired item and press Enter, the request is directly sent. Bad!

Animations are really slow and distracting.

In the header dropdown, you don't see all of the content, e.g. there is an entry "Content-Type: appli…" and another entry "Content-Type: appli…". ╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

Today, when I added an OAuth key, deleted it and added another one, it sent the request with the previous key. FML

I wrote previously:
"This addon was never finished and died a year ago. It seems the developer lost interest, given it was incarnated ca. 4 years ago and last commit is 1 year ago."
This still holds true.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

more elaborated, rich features Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

nice. this has more sophisticated features i need.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

PATCH Method Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

For all the people who need PATCH method, just click on the 'Method' dropdown list and instead of choosing from the list of existing methods, start typing in the box. It's a combo box and it will allow you to type PATCH as the name of the method and you're good to go.

It would be nice though if developer would add PATCH method to the list of default methods.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Peringkat 3 dari 5 bintang

Needs PATCH method!!!!! It's good for all the other http methods, but there's no PATCH support! And with more and more applications becoming ReSTful, and with frameworks like spring 4 / boot and other scaffolding-based frameworks, PATCH is a standard method for updating an entity. I will be using a different rest client until this one is fixed to support PATCH

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Peringkat 4 dari 5 bintang

Please add PATCH command to the REST client.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Peringkat 5 dari 5 bintang

Muy bueno

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

Good Peringkat 3 dari 5 bintang

One small thing came up my mind to bother me about RESTClient add-on is that can't render "Response Body (Preview)" when HTML returned from server. There is a small negative left padding exists somehow. Except that bug, it's flawless.

Update: Rating decreased 5 stars to 3 stars due to a few bugs/inabilities;
* You can't add more than one headers properly.
* No raw view for HTTP request (as Medlock Perlman mentioned below).
I hope developer will consider these comments for next release.

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya. 

How to load old requests Peringkat 2 dari 5 bintang

How to load old requests? I always type all content for once using it. They should be listed to select from history?

Ulasan ini dibuat untuk versi pengaya (2.0.3.1-signed.1-signed) sebelumnya.