Ulasan untuk Page Saver WE screenshot capture tool
Page Saver WE screenshot capture tool oleh Kathleen Brade, Mark Smith
83 ulasan
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 14499133, 6 tahun yang laluThis replaces Abduction! as my go-to page image saver. I'm glad at least the concept of full-page image capture has survived the transition to WebExtensions.
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Jim Gregory, 6 tahun yang laluDoes not appear to work on Firefox for Android. A new tab opens when taking a screenshot but the tab is blank. (I'd include a screenshot of the blank tab but I can't do that ☺️)
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh mrez.ir, 6 tahun yang laluVery nice and simple design and could be better if had option to choose image format on its button menu.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13671473, 6 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5oleh Adrien, 6 tahun yang laluTrès bien mais il manquerait une limitation du nombre de caractères du titre "%t" (afin de prévenir la limitation Windows des noms trop longs) et le format PDF.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 14278727, 6 tahun yang laluI use it whenever I need to remember online data. Very flexible and real time saver.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 14208137, 6 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 14174189, 6 tahun yang laluWorks perfectly! Exactly what I was looking for.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Rafael Ribeiro, 6 tahun yang laluAll functions work without any issues. Congratulations!!!
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh BarrySoetoro, 6 tahun yang laluThank you . . . Kathleen Brade and Mark Smith for a wonderfully implemented add-on that does as you stated it would without any surprises or crashes. Finally, someone managed to build a screenshot-er that simply takes a perfect PNG/JPG snapshot and puts it where you tell it to after automatically, properly naming the image in accordance with the url/page title. Couldn't want an app to do it any better than Pagesaver WE!
Haven't tried JPG's yet because historically, PNG takes and renders the best images for such things as a very long website page, and your app completes that task very well, the best I've ever tried so far, and I've tried every available, in-browser screenshot-er app that's come along for many years.
A personal pref on this: Not that you'd mess things up, but I just don't see how this could be improved, its absolutely perfect! - hence, I'm afraid to update since this version simply because it seems like apps, usually through no fault of the creators, just inherently go awry because of browser conflict. So, I'll keep updating Waterfox and leaving this BEAUTY alone until the two become incompatible and I'm forced to update?
THANK YOU BOTH SO MUCH! - Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5oleh Crick, 7 tahun yang laluHey, thanks for creating Page Saver WE — not quite up to the 5-stars of Pearl Crescent though.
BEST feature of Pearl was setting resolution.
NEED resolution setting in Page Saver WE.
Can resolution setting like Pearl Crescent had be added to Page Saver WE??
Crick - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Firebreathing, 7 tahun yang laluThank you for this excellent extension. It works very well in almost all situations.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh mtomo, 7 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5oleh Zaphod Beebledoc, 7 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13758630, 7 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13710974, 7 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 12458171, 7 tahun yang laluPage Saver is the finest page- or image-saving extension that I've ever seen, by a pretty good margin. Simpler, smoother, more effective, and considerably more flexible than most other browser grab-oids.
- Diberi peringkat 3 dari 5oleh Pollux, 7 tahun yang lalu1° With this page : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/pagesaver-we/, i have the error : "Unable to capture page: internal browser pages cannot be captured" !?
2° it misses the ability to save as pdf instead of png or jpeg, as with pdfit (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pdfit/)Balasan pengembang
dikirim 7 tahun yang laluThe "internal browser pages cannot be captured" message is caused by Mozilla's restrictions that prevent add-ons from accessing certain pages, including those at addons.mozilla.org (we plan to improve the error message).
Since most modern operating systems provide a "print to PDF" feature, we do not plan to add that capability to Page Saver. - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13619896, 7 tahun yang laluIt captures the whole page. There is an option preference to always save in a jpg to save file size rather than a png format.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh 602tryliardy, 7 tahun yang laluI love this add-on! It is simple, but powerful enough! Great job!
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 6696096, 7 tahun yang laluI loved the Pearl Crescent addon before FF57, but WE version is lacking some features:
1) capture the page without visual scrolling ***
2) use hotkey for capturing ***
3) save to Downloads\SUBFOLDER (like Downloads\PageSaver or something user-defined) ***
4) automatic filename increment postfix on name collision (instead of file overwrite) ***
5) some kind of solution to capturing of the fixed elements - for example the fixed footer panel (position:fixed; bottom: 0;) on "https://modnakasta.ua" is repeated on every scroll, instead of being drawn in the actual position (bottom: 0; in this case) or only once (as Screengrab addon does)
The features marked with *** were present in former versions of Pearl Crescent addon and/or are present in current addons from other developers (like mentioned Screengrab addon).
But Page Saver WE works faster on long complicated pages! ;-) Balasan pengembang
dikirim 7 tahun yang laluI am sorry that Page Saver WE is not working for you. Please contact us via https://pearlcrescent.com/products/pagesaver/feedback.html so that we can help you.- Diberi peringkat 2 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13502162, 7 tahun yang laluBeaucoup plus compliqué que Pearl Crescent Page Server. Ne permet pas la copie d'une plage sélectionnée.
Balasan pengembang
dikirim 7 tahun yang laluPlease excuse my English response.
It is true that Page Saver WE does not yet include all of the features of our “classic” Page Saver, but we hope to improve it in the future. I am not sure what you mean by Page Saver WE being more complicated, so please let us know more via support@pearlcrescent.com. Thanks!