Ulasan untuk NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite oleh Giorgio Maone
Tinjauan oleh Max
Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5
oleh Max, 3 bulan yang laluI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript.
2.394 ulasan
- Diberi peringkat 2 dari 5oleh Michael Rabinovsky, 2 hari yang laluNo Script is an incredibly useful add-on. In the past, I'd have given it five stars; it now gets only two (see issues below). All in all, I'd say it's still better to have it than not, but that's only because there is no better alternative, and there is no difference between having to completely disable it on a page versus not having it at all.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads. - Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Angel, 5 hari yang laluEsta vaina debería tener un modo automático para aquellos que no saben de programación.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh whatever, 5 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh HunterMirror, 8 hari yang laluHe notado en las demás reseñas, que las personas no parecen comprender el propósito de este addon. La idea es que bloquee los scripts, si una página se rompe por ello, es algo perfectamente esperable, no es culpa de la extensión perse, sino de quien desarrolló dicha página web, queda a tu criterio si lo quieres añadir a la lista blanca o no. Lo realmente triste y reprochable, es más bien que hoy en día hayan tantas páginas que quieran que actives los scripts si o si para poder usarlos, incluso páginas que no los necesitan para nada.
El abuso de los scripts y la manía de convertir las páginas web en "aplicaciones", es lo que ha causado que ahora usar el navegador implique un consumo cada vez mayor de RAM, sin contar los riesgos de seguridad innecesarios del uso de scripts, tanto para el usuario como para el webmaster/desarrollador. Así que por mi parte, prefiero que se rompan las páginas que sean, no les voy a activar los scripts si no son páginas que hagan un uso inteligente y justo de ellas. - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh k4mmi, 9 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19265671, 9 hari yang laluIt give me the power to control every script on every sites.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 18710229, 15 hari yang laluThis add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- Diberi peringkat 3 dari 5oleh Air, sebulan yang laluVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Diberi peringkat 2 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19157064, sebulan yang laluCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Cory Sanin, sebulan yang laluOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19145735, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh And?, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh A Tea Daze, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh srzlt, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh jordan9543, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh vit55555, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 18218075, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh fiendkaka, 2 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Shannon Sobeck, 2 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, 2 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19088604, 2 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh kk, 2 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19072892, 2 bulan yang lalu