AMO a été refait de fond en comble, vous voulez y jeter un œil ?Fermer
À propos de moi
|Utilisateur depuis||mars 5, 2007|
|Nombre de modules développés||0 modules|
|Moyenne des notes des modules du développeur||Pas encore évalué|
Childish Work Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles
Second review, yet their constant need to include childish graphic, and now Medals. . . come on stick to business and just give us stats. For crying out loud, awarding medals to users for sites blocked. . . just plain stupid.
You have a good product, why continue with this kindergarten garbage.
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
Well done and very comparative with Ghostery.
(suggest reading both, site and add-on PP)
Does not block as many as Ghostery, yet well on its way.
(note this add-on blocked more from the conception then Ghostery did.)
abine.com has an undisclosed WHOIS, not trustworthy for a company that also sells software. . . well in fact it is against FTC (Federal Trade Commission) law.
I personally would never be a consumer of one that does not disclose their WHOIS.
Your interface is just. . . well UGLY!
Drop the Happy Sun and congratulation, just give the facts and stats in a professional manner and leave kiddie graphics to those in kindergarten.
I prefer DNT+ and unloaded Ghostery.
I will not every financially support abine.com till they disclose their WHOIS.
Overall. . . Well Done.
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Great! anything to help keep Wal-Mart from destroying more businesses. Willfully pay more at Target to help keep them around and competition healthy.
The only thing I don't like about Target is NASCAR driver Juan Pablo Montoya. Gee what a jerk. ~smiles~
Done Right Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Very well done.
Took it to a trashed out test profile, didn't miss a single issue.
Has some dark theme issues in readability.
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Very fast indeed. Works well.
An Original Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Been awhile since I seen a truly original and useful add on for TB.
With 20 accounts in the network to monitor, this is real time saver to get an overview.
Site Compromised Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles
website.informer.com is currently blacklisted at PhishTank.
The Phishing page is:
FF5 works Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Not sure why it was just now bumped to FF4, it works fine in FF5 if you bump max version.Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (1.3.20110611.1-signed).
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles
Just curious Brand Thunder, notice you use many logos including this one that clearly states on their sites. "May not use without explicit written consent."
Have you acquired written consent from the copyrighted logos you use, or are you breaking the law.
Not Ready Noté 2 sur 5 étoiles
I like g7w was disappointed.
There is and expected conflicts with Ghostery and Request Policy.
Tried on a clean profile and found this add on made FF unresponsive at times.
I also have to agree that sources such as Norton is not best way to go.
URL void is a good source, I would also recommend incorporating WoT.
This add on is just not ready for prime time.
A walk on the Dark Side Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Just absolutely superb.
If I was going to change one thing it would be. . . hmm. . .
Guess I wouldn't.
Nicley done Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
Finely one to replace all those that went to cr^&.
Clean, no ads, intrusive toolbars, nor does it crash on pages with flash like some.
Well done in my opinion.
To Rose1 and Husar,
"Menu Editor" to get rid of listing in context menu
"Organize Status Bar"
To hide the status bar (now known as add-on bar) icon, use.
(note: at the time of this review OSB is not updated except on the author's homepage)
Works! Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
New version 5.03 works great!
Thanks for keeping up with the add on.
Nice Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
"Of course you can press ctrl+f5 but sometimes clicking can be convenient."
Because many are keyboard ignorant and simply unaware of that function.
I like the simplicity it adds.
Nice add on
Works Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
@Alternator Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Well I see why you're upset, but you can't blame WoT.
I assume this is your site: http://www.data0.net/
First lets state that you only had one bad comment by a WoT member.
Second: You are listed as a spam site on http://barracudacentral.org/rbl
Third: You are listed as a threat on Nortons Safe Search
Fourth: You are listed as a threat on McAfee
Now my own analysis so far says these are incorrect and false positives.
So keep in mind that not just WoT, but several came up with that conclusion.
The WoT member that rated most likely went off a blacklist report.
Let me explain something about WoT.
There are about 12 million users, yet if you find a site rated incorrectly or wanting a review go to the forum. There you will find that such is performed by a small handful of us, and most are very through, knowledgeable, and more then willing to help you correct issues.
You do need to get off those blacklist, and go to WoT and ask for a review when you have correct those issues.
In the meantime I will finish my analysis and rate accordingly.At this moment looks like you will be getting a good rating, yet again remove yourself from those other blacklist ok.
Now see how easy that is. . .
User: "Stealth Mode" at WoT forums.
Hope to see your request and gain your respect.
Did you get mad. Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
WoT is a wonderful tool, and the raters are very responsible I assure you.
The biggest problem is that users don't take the time to understand the program. or bother to change the settings to fit their needs.
webmazter is just mad because I questioned why he mainly hosted scam, spam, and porn sites and proudly displays such on his website http://www.shellxnet.com
Curious Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Keep in mind I am no racist by any means, yet I find that this kind of search engine sets back the progress of ending racism.
Tell me in all honesty dear, if one was to make an all white search engine how many lawsuits, and people up in arms would be screaming discrimination. When will this madness truly stop. When will African Americans realize they are feeding the problem more then solving.
Works well and nicely done, and rated accordingly.
Needs work Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles
Very simple terms could not be defined.
e.g. embryonic cells, Alzheimer’s, neuronal, and cardiomyoplasty.
But a good start.
Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
Works... but just silly.
Well I have no use, but rating on function and the possibility someone might.
Pour créer vos propres collections, vous devez avoir un compte Mozilla Add-ons.