Critiques pour WOT - Naviguez sans risque
WOT - Naviguez sans risque par WOT Services
147 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par MaSHiNiK, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Laconia, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13361995 de Firefox, il y a un anЧто случилось с дополнением - оно жрёт память и проц как не в себя. Ну и плюс оценки на некоторых сайтах просто бесполезный кусок шлакоблоков. Раньше нравилось, а сейчас невозможно пользоваться - браузер еле ворочается с ним.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18068857 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18040293 de Firefox, il y a un anA long time ago was great. Now it puts shady ads on all the websites. Eff you, WOT. I would literally pay a subscription much faster than deal with ads.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a un anHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par Coiialj, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Philip Goddard, il y a un an(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame! - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18002124 de Firefox, il y a un anrecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a un anHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Noté 1 sur 5par Matthew Conrad, il y a un anUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a un anHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par pelle, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17832293 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansMillionen von Nutzerdaten verkauft. Ich wundere mich, wieso dieses Addon überhaupt noch auf dem Browser Addon Markt exestiert! Schmutz, einfach weg damit!
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a un anHallo, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns direkt, damit wir uns das Problem ansehen können. - Noté 1 sur 5par kaiete, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par einwolfsregen, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Pavel, il y a 2 ansnot working((
When I try to use this extension, I see:
300: jar:file:///Users/pavel/Library/Application%20Support/Firefox/Profiles/gnzh2o7v.default-release/extensions/%7Ba0d7ccb3-214d-498b-b4aa-0e8fda9a7bf7%7D.xpi!/
200: filename content-length last-modified file-type
201: META-INF/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: _locales/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: addReview.html 2781 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: breachInfo.html 1655 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: error.html 842 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: images/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: libs/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: loggedOut.html 2545 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: manifest.json 6298 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: offering.html 1439 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: options.html 2687 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: popup.html 1476 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: presettings.html 2288 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: resources/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: scripts/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: slider.html 5906 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: styles/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: systempage.html 933 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILERéponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ansHi Pavel, we are sorry to hear about your experience with WOT. Please contact us directly so we can assist you with any issue- support@mywot.com - Noté 1 sur 5par serezha, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15658891 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansRubbish. Filled with ignorant reviews from people who don't understand how the internet works and can't change how your profile name appears so you doxx yourself really easily.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ansHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can understand why you feel this way and how the extension can be improved for you 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par Lucider, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15151704 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansHard to believe they're still around. No one else has ripped off their users as much as they have.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ansHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the extension can be improved for you and understand why you feel this way. - Noté 1 sur 5par WayTooBad, il y a 2 ansThis add-on tags conservative sites as untrustworthy no matter what ratings they got. It blocks them each time you try to visit even after reporting the site as safe. Meanwhile obvious scam sites are not blocked.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ansHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par xsSplater, il y a 3 ansПостоянные всплывающие окошки: "КУПИ НАШУ ПРОГРАММУ!", "НУ, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА! КУПИИИ!", "ТЕБЯ ОСТЛЕЖИВАЮТ! КУПИ!", "БЕЗ НАШЕЙ ПРОГИ ТЕБЕ ХАНА! КУПИ!"...
Спасибо, конечно, за ценное расширение, но теперь с ним хуже, чем без него. К тому же, у нас в Беларуси НЕЛЬЗЯ НИЧЕГО КУПИТЬ сейчас. Опять же тормоза и задержки жуткие с этим расширением везде.
Всего доброго!Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ansHey there, we are sad to hear about this situation.
Please contact us directly if you have any questions or if there's anything we can assist you with 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par Naitlydragon, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15503330 de Firefox, il y a 3 ansIt's a tracker. That didn't bother me much, but lately it's after your passwords. Now it's malware.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 3 ansHey there, Wot's purpose is to keep you safe while you browse online.
We invite you to contact us directly if have any questions, thanks. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17293278 de Firefox, il y a 3 ansThis used to be a good add-on, but last year they redesigned it to be basically non-functional unless you register for their services.
It also vastly slows down browsing; for me it was adding 10-15 seconds for EVERY page load, and significantly slowing down browsing within pages. This was going on for months, which I attributed to browser updates, but after removing this specific extension the problem was immediately resolved.
You can see in older reviews that they keep claiming this was a bug that they've fixed, which is clearly not true.
Do not install this. If you still have it installed from back when it was worth using, the sooner you get rid of it the better.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 3 ansHey there, thanks for sharing your feedback with us.
The bug you are describing was fixed a few months ago yet we apologize for the inconvenience you're describing.
Kindly contact us directly so we will be able to gather more details and look into it more closely.
Thanks for your cooperation 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par muddypantz, il y a 3 ansNow charged to simple security. Used to as a tracker. Suggest everyone remove this ASAP
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 3 ansHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Noté 1 sur 5par Kooxpi, il y a 3 ans