Critiques pour uMatrix
uMatrix par Raymond Hill
640 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par cryton, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17867194 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par robsku, il y a un anI was originally too "afraid" this was complex to use - not that it would stop me, but I thought it was something more than I wanted to spend time with browser.
Luckily I tried it, and very quickly realized that for me it served exactly the same purpose as NoScript - only easier. The use of scopes is fantastic - used te be that in NoScript if you allowed a domain, it was allowed on all sites; now you can select to allow things on particular domain only with the Custom option, but it's still not as flexible. And on µMatrix I by default allow on active scope, current domain - only things I know I'll want on whatever site wants to use it I'll allow for *. In NoScript you could certainly learn such habit, but it's more cumbersome, so you only go for custom rules for domains you specifically are allowing as exception on the site you're on. And even then it's less flexible than µMatrix scopes.
The only negative thing I have to say is: no version for Fennec. That is the mobile versions of Firefox, android in my case. On android FireFox I'm still stuck using NoScript.
I would likely hate using this UI in Android Firefox, but that's because of how Mozilla designed their current add-on UI system and is no better with NoScript - so come on, write that android version. Maybe try inventing slightly different UI that better fits the portrait mode while at it ;)
And thanks. This is golden. - Noté 5 sur 5par 天灭中共退党团队保平安, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12952430 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17243298 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par nboi, il y a un anJust the fastest, most flexible, and human-readable ad-blocker--- XHR req. are websites referencing others, just so you know.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Alex King, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par MyDisplayName, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par atome, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Terr, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par limti, il y a un anGreat add-on!
Maybe a good ideia be to offer to disable "Spoof referer header" in Instagram - Noté 5 sur 5par Yareg, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par ivv, il y a un anGenial.
Les autorisations de script dépendent du contexte avec un contexte global, un contexte par défaut pour la page visitée, une hiérarchies sur les noms de domaines.
Et accompagné d'une présentation claire de la portée des régles que l'on met en place.
Utilisant noscript j'en avais noté les imperfections, bien corrigées ici. - Noté 5 sur 5par Alex Wu, il y a un anI like this extension for giving me a more insightful view of what goes on in a website. It mainly serves as a secondary blocker, but its still good. To people saying it's too complicated; shame on you, just don't use it then.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Griboedovv, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par michael, il y a 2 answorks great! I like it! Would be really nice if after browser restart it kept all of the settings.
- Noté 5 sur 5par IchBinz, il y a 2 ansMust Have Tool! Das Tool ist einfach Perfekt, um unerwünschte Skripte zu blockieren. Der Hammer ist, das Programm ist super durch dacht, so kann man auch seine Regeln Offline speichern, um diese nicht erneut einstellen zu müssen, wenn man mal Firefox neu installieren muss.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17500163 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par JackyX5724, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13073083 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansThe swiss knife to control the connection behaviour of the browser. Very nice, thanks!
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dimar, il y a 2 ansThaks!! necessary to protect us! Thank you for developing this extension!!