Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
107 notes
- Noté 2 sur 5par Ferhat, il y a 6 ansThe new interface is horrible. Why did you change it that bad?
Somehow the functionality is even behaving sometimes very strange. - Noté 2 sur 5par rowbiet, il y a 6 ansUntil latest revision, was my favorite add-on. Want the old version back and can't get it.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13526140 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansThe new GUI is absolutly not understable.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13526039 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansПоследняя версия - не удобна для использования, сложна, интуитивно не понятна. Отключаю и ищу замену.
Старые версии были хорошими. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13525918 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansPeut être que c'est un bon produit, mais il est inutilisable pour moi, car il ne parle pas Français.
N'y a t-il aucune solutions pour avoir une traduction ? - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13359250 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansДизайн ужасный стал. И часто глючит, добавляешь в доверенное, жмёшь обновить - оно снова блокируется.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13499244 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansI'm gonna go back from 5 stars to 2 stars. When I got used to the new GUI, it was fine so no complaints there... It just made Firefox (quantum) a hell of a lot slower and a lot of short freezes.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13519282 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansOh gawd halp. Absolutely will not stop tossing the XSS box into my face. I can't disable it. Even if I completely disable the XSS "protection" It still won't stop tossing the box in my face, and if I tell it to "always allow" it still tosses the box up! LE URGHAURRF
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13518868 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansI really liked this extension but the latest update has ruined it. The new UI is very unintuitive and difficult to use. I struggled to get permissions to apply on a website; it kept resetting every time I closed the NoScript settings. Also, I was in those settings because NoScript now has broken most of my RSS feeds on Firefox. I do not know why or how but the only way I seem to get all my RSS feeds working is by disabling NoScript.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Rob Kent, il y a 6 ansFirstly let me say that I am a long time user of NoScript and I have sent monetary contributions to the developer at least once, possibly more often. It is a *free* addon that obviously takes many hours of work to maintain. The developer should be given thanks and respect for doing that voluntarily. No self-respecting developer sets out to make mistakes or produce something that users don't want.
So something has gone badly wrong with this release. There are two aspects to it that I can see: the script blocking operation, and the UI. Some sites that I visited no longer work with NoScript enabled, even if you allow everything. Amazon music (play sample) didn't work for me, just one example. So that needs sorting out.
As for the UI, I initially found it complicated and confusing but I am getting used to it now. What happened to the middle-click functionality?
But until the developer has managed to fix the functionality, I have to disable it. I may just end up using the Brave browser until it is fixed.
Oh, and I would like a way to save my Whitelist so that I don't lose it if I uninstall and reinstall. - Noté 2 sur 5par Franz Schneider, il y a 6 ansThis was a five-star add-on prior! I LOVED it! What happened to the user interface and the options panel with all of its features? This add-on is a mess now.
- Noté 2 sur 5par frede_256, il y a 6 ansEven as a long time user of NoScript this UI absolutely kills the experience.
I still think there is hope though. Something as little as getting the mouse-over menu activation to work would make it feel not nearly as bad.
The new HTTPS detection is also one of the greatest offenders in breaking website functionality and there isn't even a proper explanation for how or why it works. I had to experiment my way to discovering this. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13512313 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansWhy does it suck so hard now? It was a good add-on and one of the reasons I use Firefox. Think i give Opera a chance.
Since 10.1.2 Temporarly button is back; it's getting better again. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13510381 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansUsed it for Years.
The new Version doesn't work properly.
UMatrix is an alternative. - Noté 2 sur 5par radiofree, il y a 6 ansAlla fine ho deciso di fare un downgrade alla ultyima versione fi Firefox 56.
Con la v.10 di Noscipt , a parte della complicazione del nuovo menú, molte pagine non caricano correctamente incluso se si permette JavaScript globalmente. Chissa la nuova API non permette il ritorno all'interfaccia calssica?
Spero poter tornare ad usare Nocript prossimamente perche è chiaro che non sarà sicuro continuare con FF 56,02 a lungo.
Grazie comunque per i'ottima estensione che è stata fino a pochi gg fà. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13508642 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13508459 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13507402 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansNew addon for Firefox Quantum is bad. Why is log.js open always. I always get 1.000 notification on console and it takes more CPU usage. New interface is worse than old one. I can't understand which domain is blocked or allowed.
I want old interface an system back. If you can't do same. Do it similar. Or work with good interface designer. I don't want to delete this add-on.
I hope you can fix all problems soon. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13507242 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansHey guys, even the new gui is not comfortable as it used to be and so on...please consider this as a free addon and how much time is needed to update it concerning the new quantum firefox code - just give it some time and a fair chance instead of bashing around - giorgio, please go on with your good work, so we can all benefit from noscript again
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13506606 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansthis version is too complicated to handle for me. I am not the read-a-long-guide-before-doing-anything-complicated guy, so I am missing simplicity and intuitivity. I loved the former versions.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12546124 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansI do understand that it is maybe time to overthink the UI at this stage.
But I think a little more time would have done good before releasing now.
Unless you maybe released an old testversion?
Because right now noscript really is unusable.
But thumps up for good work overall. - Noté 2 sur 5par LucasZ, il y a 6 ansErgonomically it's so bad I don't even want to use it. Can't disable it for specific site, can't open expandable menu to manage the scripts. Big step back.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13502317 de Firefox, il y a 6 answas THE BEST, for years and years
the new version for new FF is way way way way less user friendly, and almost not worth the effort :(
edit: actually it's completely worthless now gonna remove - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13502299 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansWhere is the option for Temporarily Allow All or Temporarily Allow individual scripts? This version is impossible to use. I used temporary permissions all the time because so many sites have many scripts.
The UI is awful and not at all intuitive. There is a page I'm trying to enable right now but I don't know how to. No matter what scripts I enable or disable it's not loading like it used to, where before I could just temporarily allow scripts and everything would be fine. I'm clicking every single script shown in that long list, locking and unlocking each one and reloading, and it's not working.
(And what's up with unlock being red and lock being green? The UI is not user friendly)
I think i have to disable this until it's improved. I want to be happy it's back but it's unusable.