Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

Awesome, concerning the obnoxious scripts that enter in to the internet experience.

...I wonder if it would be practical to make a feature of a user account to synchronize blocked & allowed scripts for users that access the application across multiple computers/accounts?
and maybe change the shortcut from the [unlisted?] 'Ctrl+Shift+S' (foxmarks sync) to another... i hate that I can't continue the Foxmarks key shortcut.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Simply the best way to protect your system by defining exactly those permissions for scripts you need. Fanxalot!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Amazing one

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Simply Genial. Constantly updated, constantly excellent!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.6). 

Too much of a PITA Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles

Good in concept, but....

Whether this script provides an extra layer of security or not, IMO, it is a nagging PITA, which requires constant baby-sitting.

Yes, you can auto-allow bookmarks and with some surfing you can have it learn/allow your frequent sites...but anything else you surf, you will constantly be running to the button to temp allow just to gain functionality of many sites - which IMO, defeats the whole purpose of any added security benefit and makes normal surfing miserable.

If you knowingly frequent questionable sites such as porn or warez etc...this might be for you.

But like others have said, FF is already much safer than IE, I have a phishing filter and Norton Internet Security 2008 running in real-time with heuristics and firewall and a scheduled AV scan nightly.

When I weigh it out I'm safe enough without it and still have an enjoyable experience.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.8). 

GOOD Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

GOOD! NOW NO BUG

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

super

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.8). 

Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

I recomend it to people, who doesn't like AdBlock. ;-)

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

When I've built a machine, Firefox + NoScript are two of the earlier things to do.

For those who have a problem using it, particularly when they claim to spend a lot of time answering requests all of the time, I think they don't understand how black & white listing works.

If it didn't bug you for potential problems, you'd be frustrated because you'd have to specify each item you want to work. As NoScript stands, everything is good until you block it.

Once you've stated your choices, it doesn't came back and bug you any more. The reason it happens so often (up front) is because you're running into new turf.

It's like firewalls: there are two types: everything is open until you close it. Everything blocked until you open it. Which is easier to maintain? Most people who aren't long-termers on the systems side will say everything is good until you say it's bad. This puts the burden upon you to block the troublemakers. If it's blocked until you open it, the only holes in the system will be the ones you punch.

NoScript takes the first view - notify, but verify. As I said, if it blocked until you opened, you'd be just as disappointed in the beginning until you punched holes as you need to.

You think answering NoScript is bad? Think about what Vista does. It's a pain the tokus. But people screamed about the lack of Windows' security. It's no more effective, but if someone yells about it, they can ask, "Which way do you want it? Block or no block?" (that's a yes/no question, no room to provide semantics.

If you don't like NoScript, don't use it. I'll be bothered for the first couple of times I visit a site, but after that, there's nothing but joy.

Now, if someone could provide me with a location where I can blacklist a list of domains (and its descendants), I'd sleep better. I have no fun in visiting something like doubleclick when I could just specify *doubleclick* ahead of time.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Awsome thing. I ain't have good computer so it really helping me. ;)

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Simply awesome. It does exactly what it's supposed to do. Frequent updates show a genuine interest in up-to-the-minute security

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.6). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

i can't surf the web without it. the web is fast and safe again without javascript!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.2). 

Recommended to make browsing safer Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

This and Adblock + makes surfing safer. Never had a spyware because of them. And I've not been annoyed by those annoying popups and ads in like a year. I prefer clicking one or two times than having those ads, spyware and malware in my computer. 100% Recommended!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.2). 

Checkbox against each site...can this be implemented please? Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

Just saw this review down the page, and have to second it...it would really speed things up, no?

"How about giving us a checkbox against each site so that we can change the permissions for multiple domains/addresses in one shot rather than having to do it one at a time? I have set Noscript to reload the page after each permission change, so when I go to a site like rawstory.com, I have to enable permissions for something like 5 or 6 sites and reload the page each time. Please consider this request. Thank you for your great work."

Thanks for your fantastic work. Everyone ought to throw this developer a bit of cash for his constant efforts. This means you :)

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.2). 

Clean cache, clear cookies -- does this change NoScript settings? Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

Sorry for the dumb question, but I've read the documentation and I haven't figured out this: sometimes I have to "Clear Private Data...", at least the cache or the cookies. When I do so, do I lose all the permissions I've set in NoScript for each site I come across? Some pages have 5 or more things to allow before a video plays, or a comment box is enabled, and to have to reset (meaning re-load) each page that many times really slows me down.

I hope that is a clear question. Thanks. Otherwise I think it's a great add-on, combined with AdBlock Plus and I feel I can enjoy safe sex, er, surfing.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.5.2). 

You can safely clear all your privacy data...

... including cookies and cache: the whitelist will remain untouched.

Excellent addon Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

This addon is a must have. I was getting so sick of going to websites that would spam me with popups or try to automatically play music or videos. I would highly recommend this addon to anyone who is a power user, especially those who use stumbleupon.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.4.9.5). 

great Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

have been using this for two years or something, always did its job very well; blocking evil scripts. with this addon you are even safe at the greatest sites containing spyware. never had a problem.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.4.9.5). 

Allowing blocked site for specific sites Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

This addon is great.

I just wish there was a way to enable a script in some sites and not others.

For instance, I have google-analytics.com disabled in general. But some sites require it to function properly. But I don't want to manually enable/disable. Instead I wish there was a way to set it so that certain scripts are enabled on some sites and disabled on others automatically.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.4.9.5). 

Great but had an error on restarting FF. Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

I had an error when restarting FF when updating to this version. I disabled and re enabled it and its working again. ^_^

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.4.9.5). 

Wazoo Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Usually surfing the web is like being slowly pecked to death by chickens.
NoScript gives back my sanity and always works well.

Thanks for the great little helper.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (1.4.9).