- par IgotaBONGO, il y a 3 ansNoté 1 sur 5Couldn't come up with a name of your own? Because you're NOT an upgraded version of NoScript. It's that the ORIGINAL NoScript by Giorgio is a GPL product that you can continue this user deception for your own benefit. But hey, does this sound familiar?
Embrace, extend, and extinguish.
And how does that work for you..?
I suppose your masters didn't like the original NoScript that much? And I assume that, as with (the .xpi of) your other add ons, it includes the sources you'll allow by default because they're paying the bills?
- par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13542504 de Firefox, il y a 4 ansNoté 1 sur 5This rewrite is useless for all but website developers, simply because 90+ percent of its users cannot perform FUNCTIONAL as opposed to STRUCTURAL control.
Next time try testing with other users. It is as useful to me as me detailing the microcode implementation of the circular shift assembly language instruction on a particular processor would be to you. Wake up guys! Learn how to user test widely used products or find some job far,far away from end user software. Know your audience. Silo-ing in software is as destructive of quality as it is in politics.
- par f00kwit, il y a 4 ansNoté 1 sur 5Not nearly as flexible or useful as the old Noscript. The "temporarily allow" functionality is gone (or buried never to be found) and some webpages do not function at all. One of my banks being one that doesn't function, so this is a remove and burn add-on for me. I understand that the new FF required new versions of things like add-ons and extensions, but this one is just a dud.
- par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13471731 de Firefox, il y a 4 ansNoté 1 sur 5compliqué d'utilisation, blocage tout ou rien plutôt que de choisir un script à autoriser. bref rien à voir avec "no-script", utilisation du non de du module connu pour attirer des utilisateurs
- par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13404198 de Firefox, il y a 4 ansNoté 1 sur 5Not as good as the old NoScript which allowed users to temporarily allow allow scripts. I will not use Firefox without the real NoScript.
Bring back the real NoScript.
- par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13361818 de Firefox, il y a 4 ansNoté 1 sur 5It is almost all or nothing.
Some site might have some script you want to block but you are forced to allow all of them or nothing. Eventually, I keep adding site to the whitelist instead of blocking some scripts.
- par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13297723 de Firefox, il y a 4 ansNoté 1 sur 5You can't decide to block individual scripts from a website. Completely useless tool for experienced users. Can't wait for the real "No Script" to be updated and compatible with Firefox 57.