Can I undo a report Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles
By mistake I reported an issue for an extension which works perfectly well for me. I can't find a way to undo this, or send a success report instead?
Please let us know still not working in Firefox Nightly 57 Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
I like this add-on a lot. Even with letting Legacy add-ons thought this add-on still does not show up any ware so it can be used.
Please let users know if this add-on will able to be updated or not so... we will know if will work on Firefox Nightly 57+ or not. Because if can add-on needs updated to Web Extensions to work. Thank youI like this add-on a lot.
Please let users know if this add-on will able to be updated or not so... we will know if will work on Firefox Nightly 57+ or not. Because if can add-on needs updated to and Web Extensions to work. Thank you
5 Stars Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Noté 2 sur 5 étoiles
Should be included in Beta builds by default Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
Curious why it isn't?
Also, identified one extension (Nimbus Screen Capture) as compatible when it isn't, and the Developer has acknowledged as such.
Don't work with thunderbird 52 Noté 2 sur 5 étoiles
need update for thunderbird 52Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.3).
Good, but Needs to Support Thunderbird again. Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
Good, but Needs to Support Thunderbird again.Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.3).
Great Addon, but should be core. Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
e10s isn't going away, the old way is.
webextensions aren't going away, the old way is.
This should be core to the browser extensions list and in a column that I can sort on.
This add-on isn't a nice-to-have, it's effectively an upcoming bug notifier.
Shame *ding* *ding* *ding* Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Invaluable for calling out developers for not supporting e10s.Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.3).
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
very easy to use.Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.3).
Useful for flagging Add-On redesign candidates Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
I have been rebuilding FF 50.0 Add-On installations for, severally, Ubuntu® 16.04.1-LTS and Microsoft® Windows® 10 Build 1607 10.0.14393.451. This Extension has verified many of my formerly used Extensions as in need of complete redesign; the Merci_chao Extension Personal Menu, needed for UI cleanliness for some Users' needs, is not multiprocess-ready at last check, and I'll probably have a Bug to file at Launchpad to give a place to track a completely new Ubufox' construction (Package xul-ext-ubufox 3.2, a Depend for FF on Ubuntu®, is not multiprocess-ready).Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.3).
Thanks, I'm now able to anticipate which of my add-ons will break when traditional XPCOM/XUL add-ons get desupported in November 2017 Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
Thanks so much for writing this. I was dismayed to see in about:addons after installing this that several add-ons that are very important to me don't yet support e10s, even though most of them are add-ons where you wouldn't think it'd be significant whether they're running in a single shared process or not. I'm grateful that I'll be able to track the progress my add-on collection makes towards multiprocess compatibility, and will know which developers to poke if needed.
Now we just need an add-on like this for the more terrifying impending change, the elimination of the original XPCOM and XUL add-on APIs in favor of the cross-browser WebExtensions API. That change will of course require a lot more work by devs to update their add-ons for, and reportedly the initial public version will _not_ replicate all the functionality of the old APIs.
BTW, in regards to BlackMagicZurgo's review before me, note that current public versions of Firefox disable multiprocess if you have _any_ add-ons installed, regardless of whether they're multiprocess compatible or not.
Now this add-on denotes XPCOM/XUL add-ons as well, with "LEGACY". Also, current versions of Firefox of course only disable multiprocess if multiprocess-incompatible add-ons are installed.
I'm rating this add-on 4 rather than 5 stars only because the format it uses cuts off much of the name and almost the entire description of each add-on, unless your browser window is crazy-wide. It'd be nice if the "Compatible..." / "Not compatible with multiprocess." label would start higher up, like the "LEGACY" indicator, and would wrap across two lines. Even better would be an option to have it display just a short indicator, like "MP: ✓" and "MP: X" (or "e10s" instead of "MP"), and there could be a tooltip on each one with the info spelled out and/or a key at the bottom of the page. Finally, it'd be nice to have an option to hide the "Report Issue" buttons to regain some horizontal space, since it's also possible to report issues using the add-on's toolbar button.
Addons marked as compatible multi-process.. but are indeed not. Noté 2 sur 5 étoiles
Add-on Compatibility Reporter mark some addons as : "Compatible with multi-process" but, however, some add-ons are actually NOT compatibles, like, say, FireGestures or Firebug (about:support report that "some addons disabled multi-process").Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.1).
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Tenho no meu navegadorCette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.1).
Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles
Adds the text "Not compatible/Compatible with multiprocess" to every add-on in the manager, which is pretty ugly. Just the icon would be much better.Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (2.2.1).
mutilprocess ? Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
j'utilise FF depuis plusieurs années actuellement v48.02
Selon ce module le test sur les 23 extensions installées et maj ,16 seraient incompatibles multiprocess
c'est pas pour demain
Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles
good idea , ive just seen i have a lot of non multiprocess addons lol , even though i run ff50 everything is fine though and non of the adons makes any stress ...
what i don´t like is that you guys inject a stylesheet into the addon page ... which breaks my own stylesheet for that site .. it would be enough to just insert the icon besides the adon icon honestly !
Excellent Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Works really well :)Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (184.108.40.206-signed.1-signed).
Very good Addon Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Works perfect on Firefox version 37.0.2.
It will be good if page show which addons was checked with this addon or any other default addon or function checker !
I mean for every addon which has been checked will be showed below users reviews on the right side!
This will be very helpful for other users. Firefox have alot addons which is very good and I am also very satisfied. Every user use own addon he like.... but problem is that some addons doesn`t work or they not working correct. If page show which addons work perfect will be very helpful....
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles
Working great in Firefox 37Cette critique concerne une version précédente du module (220.127.116.11-signed.1-signed).