Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
164 notes
- Noté 3 sur 5par Huppat, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par 半透明狐人間, il y a 4 ansこのアドオンが有効だと、ファイルのダウンロードができなくなります。
安全なのはいいですが、いちいち許可しなくてはならず、面倒ですね。
ほかにも、ページが正常に表示されなくなったり...
これは、ほんとにセキュリティを重視する人や、危険そうなサイトに接続したいとき向けのアドオンです。
普通に快適なブラウジングをしたい人にはお勧めできません。
安全なのはすごい安全です。 - Noté 3 sur 5par asham, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15529086 de Firefox, il y a 4 ansI installed Noscript yesterday and am trying it out, but I'm about to un-install it because it breaks the two websites I use the most -- www.flickr.com and familysearch.org, even though I've put those addresses in the per-site permissions list.
flickr.com -- while the photos display, they are no longer selectable. Also, the statistics page no longer shows the usual graphs, etc. Also, the page width detection is now broken, so the photos are displayed as if they are on a narrow device instead of a desktop computer.
familysearch.org -- the main menu text and wrap-around stuff is displayed but there is no list of genealogy collections to select.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/ -- images on video thumbnails show the BBC logo on a grey background rather than the thumbnail image. - Noté 3 sur 5par P223, il y a 5 ansReally have the latest user interface. Earlier I could manage blocking specific scripts in a few clicks now it's buggy and totally charged
- Noté 3 sur 5par Richard Patry, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par yurin, il y a 5 ansNoScript breaks some sites in Firefox 71.0b6, for example https://russian.rt.com/news
- Noté 3 sur 5par def35, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15203328 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15321542 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansWhy does NoScript reset all my permission settings when I switch between Linux and Windows synced Firefox? A real nuisance!
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14549179 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par bosch1516, il y a 5 ansIt works as it should, but the redesigned interface does not show the full script in the drop-down list which feels like I'm flying blind on what I'm allowing or blocking. I found better that works as well.
- Noté 3 sur 5par adgbrshruwzawrh, il y a 5 ansSehr mächtig, häufig bin ich aber selbst ausgesperrt und muss NoScript deaktivieren.
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14689135 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14568589 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansDoes it's job, but forgets its settings and allowed pages every few days, pretty annoying.
- Noté 3 sur 5par evets90, il y a 5 ansI wish it would have a button that could just make a website work. It's such a pain to have to manually fix every site with this extension. Please make it more user friendly.
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14554915 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansI had to roll it back to an earlier version 10.2.0 , this new version forgets its settings and is horrid to use. Love the previous versions tho. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/versions/
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14550203 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansSince last update the sites aren't reloaded when I enable scripts on them.
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14062232 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par Maja Potega, il y a 6 ansDas Plugin wurde von Firefox empfohlen aber die Einstellung ist zu kompliziert. Die Menüführung ist ganz anders als auf den Screenshots. Die Beschreibung ist auf einer Extraseite, auf der sich wiederum mehrere Weiterleitungslinks befinden. Ich habe es wieder entfernt, weil zu User unfriendly.
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14298576 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansFirst off, I've used NoScript for a number of years and have donated and am hovering between 2-3 stars due to the terrible UI.
Unfortunately the UI remains extremely poor, with confusing wording and very bad icon designs (w.r.t usability, nevermind esthetics). The UI uses double negatives, which is bad (ref: MS and Apple). This may be a side effect of Italian translation.
There is not differentiation with colour: blue and red are used in the icons regardless if something is "safe" or "unsafe". The exclamation mark doesn't work that well for conveying meaning (it's "sort of" a warning, but then the "stop sign" is also used - but now the stop sign means, "stop restricting" (again - double negative))
E.g.
S!: disable restrictions (change icon. to, almost anything, change wording to: "Allow everything (including blocked scripts)")
!: disable restrictions for this tab (change icon to almost anything else, change wording to: "Allow everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)")
Clock!: Set all to temporarily trusted (change icon, "Temporarily Trust everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)" )
Clock + Stop symbol: revoke temporary permissions (change icon, wording to "Normal operation"?)