Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13551624 de Firefox
Noté 2 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13551624 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansIt is a real pitty that you do not seem to want to listen to the incredible ammount of people who are trying to tell you that you messed this up.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 6 ans"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2 148 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Leland359, il y a un jour
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14210074 de Firefox, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par xiuxxx, il y a 11 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Nyaa, il y a 12 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par libertycrrbc, il y a 12 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Nick James, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18165873 de Firefox, il y a 15 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Quaesitrix, il y a 16 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18157516 de Firefox, il y a 20 jours
- Noté 2 sur 5par Grg, il y a un mois2 stars because i cant enapble this addon for only one site on Firefox, like in Chrome....
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14089294 de Firefox, il y a un moisNoscript has for me always been a painful experience. But now it is totally out of control in my Win7/Firefox pc. The latest depradation is I can no longer pay important personal monthly bills via the net and have had to resort to sending personal checks via the US mail. And there seems to be no way to fix the problem other than the excruciating learning curve an 85 year old used must face in learning a new operating system. Ed Weldon
- Noté 5 sur 5par Filo, il y a un mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par panthep2516, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par SuperStevie88, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par YonY, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Santos.Jms, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par joborun, il y a un moisI've been using this at ALL TIMES for the past 12y? and I just can't think of browsing without it.
In many cases when "content" is presented as blackmail exchange for enabling scripts I just pass on the deal and seek content free of dangerous scripts.
Libre-js in theory sounds good, but in practice .. it is not feasible to manage, or worthy of trust. Mega-Corps can produce libre-open-free-code and scripts, and still be problematic, as many naive people perceive what they offer as FOSS as "a good thing", and they have no interest in ever wasting a penny to produce "a good thing", unless they are selling it.
Although I DO MISS the old 5.1.. wui I got used to this over the years, but hands down I'd still prefer it over this menu.
Luckily most serious FOSS projects and like minded web-designers produce clean easy to read content without scripts. - Noté 3 sur 5par M. Möhling, il y a un moisWorks mostly well, but since quite while it *always* reports cross-site scripting alerts when using ebay.de, an absolute nuisance.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Blood_Wraith, il y a un moisNoScript is essentially an extra layer of ballistic glass on top of your antivirus when using Firefox, and goes great with an adblocker, such as Adblock Plus.
A good percentage of malware is spread through sketchy site scripts on dubious sites, and even some ads. A lot of that can be prevented by using NoScript and Adblock Plus.
Remember to allow scripts for sites you completely trust. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14579462 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18115684 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisSehr tolle app.
Zählt z Bsp 3 scripts, zeigt aber nur eine an.
oder er zählt 3 zeigt aber 8 an.
Du deaktivierst alle Einschränkungen für ein Tab, aber es funktioniert trotzdem nicht alles. Erst nach GLOBALEM Deaktivieren gehts endlich.
Hilfetexte gibst auch nicht. - Noté 5 sur 5par MP3Martin, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17760247 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois