Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12839 de Firefox
Noté 2 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12839 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansEDIT: OK after some time playing around with the settings I understand it much better and the functionality appears to work well. I suggest people experiment with the settings a bit, or check out the noscript forum where there are some explanations of the UI if you find the relevant threads.
In the meantime, I will keep my 2-star rating until a proper help guide to the UI is incorporated into the addon as a link, and an on-boarding process for new installations includes a pop up alerting users to the guide as this is sorely needed, especially for users of the old add-on. This rating reflects my experience as a new user, not my experience now, as this is more relevant to potential new users reading these reviews.
---
I agree with others that I do not really know how to use this addon any more whereas I had perfect intuition of it pre-57 days. The interface is non-intuitive and is not really explained anywhere. After some time I think I am beginning to understand it but I am still not sure because I cannot reference what I think against official documentation. The latter would help a lot.
I don't blame the addon developer, as he probably had to develop it in his spare time in time for release 57. i acknowledge the effort to upgrade the addon to the new API while many other developers gave up. Thank you, Giorgio for that.
I do blame Mozilla somewhat for switching to a substandard extension API and not having certain vital API features available to developers to test until very late (and some not even yet existing). I realise there were some reasons to make the change, but they should have considered the effect on the existing users and developers and tried to mitigate it somehow.
While I agree that expressing such anger in obscene words is inappropriate, it is appropriate to give an honest review and rating. My rating expresses what I currently think about this addon and is by no means an emotional reaction to change.
I am sure that many improvements will come and user feedback will be acknowledged by the developer. I encourage him to ignore the insults and continue. My review and rating will improve as the addon improves in my estimation.
In the meantime, I will keep my 2-star rating until a proper help guide to the UI is incorporated into the addon as a link, and an on-boarding process for new installations includes a pop up alerting users to the guide as this is sorely needed, especially for users of the old add-on. This rating reflects my experience as a new user, not my experience now, as this is more relevant to potential new users reading these reviews.
---
I agree with others that I do not really know how to use this addon any more whereas I had perfect intuition of it pre-57 days. The interface is non-intuitive and is not really explained anywhere. After some time I think I am beginning to understand it but I am still not sure because I cannot reference what I think against official documentation. The latter would help a lot.
I don't blame the addon developer, as he probably had to develop it in his spare time in time for release 57. i acknowledge the effort to upgrade the addon to the new API while many other developers gave up. Thank you, Giorgio for that.
I do blame Mozilla somewhat for switching to a substandard extension API and not having certain vital API features available to developers to test until very late (and some not even yet existing). I realise there were some reasons to make the change, but they should have considered the effect on the existing users and developers and tried to mitigate it somehow.
While I agree that expressing such anger in obscene words is inappropriate, it is appropriate to give an honest review and rating. My rating expresses what I currently think about this addon and is by no means an emotional reaction to change.
I am sure that many improvements will come and user feedback will be acknowledged by the developer. I encourage him to ignore the insults and continue. My review and rating will improve as the addon improves in my estimation.
2 147 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14210074 de Firefox, il y a 4 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par xiuxxx, il y a 5 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Nyaa, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par libertycrrbc, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Nick James, il y a 8 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18165873 de Firefox, il y a 9 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Quaesitrix, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18157516 de Firefox, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 2 sur 5par Grg, il y a 21 jours2 stars because i cant enapble this addon for only one site on Firefox, like in Chrome....
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14089294 de Firefox, il y a un moisNoscript has for me always been a painful experience. But now it is totally out of control in my Win7/Firefox pc. The latest depradation is I can no longer pay important personal monthly bills via the net and have had to resort to sending personal checks via the US mail. And there seems to be no way to fix the problem other than the excruciating learning curve an 85 year old used must face in learning a new operating system. Ed Weldon
- Noté 5 sur 5par Filo, il y a un mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par panthep2516, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par SuperStevie88, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par YonY, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Santos.Jms, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par joborun, il y a un moisI've been using this at ALL TIMES for the past 12y? and I just can't think of browsing without it.
In many cases when "content" is presented as blackmail exchange for enabling scripts I just pass on the deal and seek content free of dangerous scripts.
Libre-js in theory sounds good, but in practice .. it is not feasible to manage, or worthy of trust. Mega-Corps can produce libre-open-free-code and scripts, and still be problematic, as many naive people perceive what they offer as FOSS as "a good thing", and they have no interest in ever wasting a penny to produce "a good thing", unless they are selling it.
Although I DO MISS the old 5.1.. wui I got used to this over the years, but hands down I'd still prefer it over this menu.
Luckily most serious FOSS projects and like minded web-designers produce clean easy to read content without scripts. - Noté 3 sur 5par M. Möhling, il y a un moisWorks mostly well, but since quite while it *always* reports cross-site scripting alerts when using ebay.de, an absolute nuisance.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Blood_Wraith, il y a un moisNoScript is essentially an extra layer of ballistic glass on top of your antivirus when using Firefox, and goes great with an adblocker, such as Adblock Plus.
A good percentage of malware is spread through sketchy site scripts on dubious sites, and even some ads. A lot of that can be prevented by using NoScript and Adblock Plus.
Remember to allow scripts for sites you completely trust. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14579462 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18115684 de Firefox, il y a un moisSehr tolle app.
Zählt z Bsp 3 scripts, zeigt aber nur eine an.
oder er zählt 3 zeigt aber 8 an.
Du deaktivierst alle Einschränkungen für ein Tab, aber es funktioniert trotzdem nicht alles. Erst nach GLOBALEM Deaktivieren gehts endlich.
Hilfetexte gibst auch nicht. - Noté 5 sur 5par MP3Martin, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17760247 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par BrunoFontes.Net, il y a 2 mois