Critiques pour NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite par Giorgio Maone
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12968835 de Firefox
Noté 3 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12968835 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansI previously said
"Sadly, I have to agree with some of the other reviews.....
The new version is quite simply, POO.
This is perfectly illustrated by the fact that I had to re-allow scripts that had been set as trusted just to post this sad reflection on what was, for the most part a highly useful and mature extension with a user interface that was relatively straight forward to interpret and use.
The new interface is Terrible to put it mildly. Its over 'simplification' and design has produced a bewildering experience that makes ones head ache in a state of near vertigo when first used. Just to add insult to injury, as previously stated, you will probably have repeat the process when the settings are forgotten.
No script has always been annoying when visiting a site for the first time. Identifying the minimum scripts allowed for site functionality whilst blocking the rest, was a tedious process but it was offset by the fact it only had to be done once. The result was a huge dividend of security, privacy, speed of page load, reduced memory usage and increased stability to the browser as a whole from avoiding execution of unnecessary and in many cases poorly written, bloated code.
In short the new NoScript is a horrible disappointment, in stark contrast to the wonderful browsing experience of Firefox 57"
At that time I felt the review was completely justified.
But, there is hope!
The UI is improving and in some ways, superior to the old which I think we all have to agree was a bit clumsy.
I understand now the 'forgetting' of settings directly attributable to the API changes in Quantum and Mozillas role in it and the unfair but understandable scorn from users like myself who have become accustomed to features being removed and UI changes from likes of Microsoft and others in the name of 'progress' and our willingness to unload both barrels as a result.
I persisted with noscript, temporally allowing just about everything, relying on Sandboxie protection.
It improves with every update to my everlasting gratitude and I cannot wait for the day I rate it 5 stars!
THANK YOU to the developer(s) for all of your hard work and persistence in the face of mounting criticism from people like myself.
No Script is in my opinion a vital extension for security, privacy, stability, user control and the enrichment of the browsing experience...
"Sadly, I have to agree with some of the other reviews.....
The new version is quite simply, POO.
This is perfectly illustrated by the fact that I had to re-allow scripts that had been set as trusted just to post this sad reflection on what was, for the most part a highly useful and mature extension with a user interface that was relatively straight forward to interpret and use.
The new interface is Terrible to put it mildly. Its over 'simplification' and design has produced a bewildering experience that makes ones head ache in a state of near vertigo when first used. Just to add insult to injury, as previously stated, you will probably have repeat the process when the settings are forgotten.
No script has always been annoying when visiting a site for the first time. Identifying the minimum scripts allowed for site functionality whilst blocking the rest, was a tedious process but it was offset by the fact it only had to be done once. The result was a huge dividend of security, privacy, speed of page load, reduced memory usage and increased stability to the browser as a whole from avoiding execution of unnecessary and in many cases poorly written, bloated code.
In short the new NoScript is a horrible disappointment, in stark contrast to the wonderful browsing experience of Firefox 57"
At that time I felt the review was completely justified.
But, there is hope!
The UI is improving and in some ways, superior to the old which I think we all have to agree was a bit clumsy.
I understand now the 'forgetting' of settings directly attributable to the API changes in Quantum and Mozillas role in it and the unfair but understandable scorn from users like myself who have become accustomed to features being removed and UI changes from likes of Microsoft and others in the name of 'progress' and our willingness to unload both barrels as a result.
I persisted with noscript, temporally allowing just about everything, relying on Sandboxie protection.
It improves with every update to my everlasting gratitude and I cannot wait for the day I rate it 5 stars!
THANK YOU to the developer(s) for all of your hard work and persistence in the face of mounting criticism from people like myself.
No Script is in my opinion a vital extension for security, privacy, stability, user control and the enrichment of the browsing experience...
2 307 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Shogun5362, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Tempdirz, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 3 sur 5par Pavel, il y a 8 joursIt's good to block the scripts, but it started to loose the list of enabled sites every now and then. An to have some sites to work may require enabling several other sites. So I have to resort to "Enable all temporarily" due to my enabled list being lost.
- Noté 3 sur 5par TDGalea, il y a 8 joursFantastic plugin to handle all the pathetic popups and tracking of the modern web. Only down two stars because it seems to keep forgetting my trusted sites. It's almost as if it's trying to sync, but instead of syncing my saves to new devices, new devices sync their empty lists to existing devices instead.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Andy, il y a 10 joursI've disabled restrictions globally in the extension and still get a "NoScript XSS Warning" when using SSO. There's no option to temporarily allow it; It's either allow this one attempt (that got interrupted and will therefore fail) or permenantly allow it forever. How about an "allow for this session" or "allow for x time"? Or even better, when I use the "disable globally" option it completely stops NoScript interfering? I've had to complettely disable the entire extension just to log in to some websites (trust pilot this specific time).nnot
- Noté 5 sur 5par Blaze Fox, il y a 13 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par rimutaka, il y a 15 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par Ci3MNiC, il y a 16 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16945218 de Firefox, il y a 17 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ruslan, il y a 18 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Heathen Hammer, il y a 20 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Pascal, il y a 23 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15400689 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18382782 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17609499 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Sonya, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18662133 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Rocky_A, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par TheCulturedCommander, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18654212 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par NEWMAN88FREEDOM, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ole, il y a 2 moisBeen a NoScript user for years. Not a fan of letting arbitrary code on my machines.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18636225 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12962545 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisFor me it mucked up Firefox, giving me "Enable Firefox" (already enabled) and forcing Firefox to ask for permission to open each site. I mention this to give the head's up. BUT as someone wiser said, it's "an awesome addon, [but] you have to be extremely careful with it. It can really mess up your web experience if you don't know how to use it."