۱۱ بررسی
- دارای رتبه ۵ از ۵توسط کاربر فایرفاکس 17850388، در ۳ سال پیش🔥 I don't understand how this doesn't have more love - it's so freakin good! Postman alternative that's easy, free, and in your browser. Thanks Mirko! 🔥
پاسخ توسعهدهنده
ارسال شده در ۳ سال پیشThank you so much for your kind feedback.
This comment is very motivating 🙏🏻 - دارای رتبه ۳ از ۵توسط Pascal Craponne، در ۷ سال پیشOn aurait aimé la possibilité de coller une requête brute directement, plutôt que de la recomposer champ par champ.
پاسخ توسعهدهنده
ارسال شده در ۷ سال پیشFirst of all thank you for your feedback.
At the moment you can import a complete request using the HAR format (here the specification http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/har-12-spec/) and here (https://gist.github.com/mirkoperillo/9841f65680d7890b0d95eb3635e4d45f) a sample of request in this format.
Resting uses HAR format to import and export requests.
Do you have any other idea about the format of a not-elaborated request to bulk into Resting ? پاسخ توسعهدهنده
ارسال شده در ۷ سال پیشThank you for your feedback. I checked it on the last version of Resting (v0.12.0 - Firefox 66) and it seems OK.
My test:
1.I created context1 and define url variable with value 'www.google.com'
2.I created context2 and define url variable with value 'www.yahoo.com'
3.I created a request putting {url} in the url field.
4.I bound request with context1 (using context tab) and the execution used www.google.com as expected
5.I bound request with context2 (using context tab) and the execution used www.yahoo.com as expected
6.I bound request with context1 again (using context tab) and the execution used www.google.com as expected
Please if your problem is not resolved, feel free to post here ( or on the issue tracker of Resting https://github.com/mirkoperillo/resting/issues)
the steps to reproduce exactly your problem, I'll give it max priority- دارای رتبه ۵ از ۵توسط Mansoor Ahmed B K، در ۸ سال پیش
پاسخ توسعهدهنده
ارسال شده در ۸ سال پیشThank you for the feedback, I'm happy that Resting helps in your daily routine!پاسخ توسعهدهنده
ارسال شده در ۹ سال پیشThank you for feedback. You are right, headers aren't loaded correctly loading a bookmark. The issue is already fixed and it will be included in the next release.