Revisiones de Wikiwand: Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand: Wikipedia Modernized por Wikiwand
Revisado por AMC
Se valoró con 1 de 5
por AMC, el hace 8 mesesI used it for a long time and in the last few months has completely broken, leaving me unable to load Wikipedia at all without disabling it.
They started pushing "AI" based crap into it at the same time.
The structural choices they made with the new layout broke other tools ability to summarize and excerpt articles as well.
After month of breakages and AI marketing ads BS I gave up and moved to Modern for Wikipedia. I would recommend you do the same.
They started pushing "AI" based crap into it at the same time.
The structural choices they made with the new layout broke other tools ability to summarize and excerpt articles as well.
After month of breakages and AI marketing ads BS I gave up and moved to Modern for Wikipedia. I would recommend you do the same.
519 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ivan, el hace un día
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por anothertemple, el hace 14 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Matyi, el hace 15 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Harsha, el hace 15 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por OlavWolfiken, el hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Pilar Rodriguez Aranda, el hace un mes
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por syrthio, el hace un mesit's... pretty to look at and read, but that's about it. I was excited to find this, but grew increasingly disappointed. most articles I personally read do not have images large enough attached to the article to not get extremely distorted by the otherwise-nice-looking banner Wikiwand generates, and customization is pretty basic (and no longer matches the screenshots here, unless I'm missing something). I was also not pleased with yet more shoving of AI down my throat. it took three or four times switching it off before it stopped popping up. the deal-breaker for me, though, is the loss of the hover preview for Wikilinks -- apparently, they're supposed to work, but never did for me and I get distracted enough as-is without having to open an entirely new page/tab just to see what the article is about. ultimately, user styles for vanilla Wikipedia serve my needs better.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por oThi, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por adriaslb, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por pulsar14, el hace 2 mesesVery good Layout but ... audio reading should be fixed. 1st the reading velocity is not the one set in windows speech; 2nd, the voice type always reset to the 1st available in the list. E.g. If I choose Susan as my preferred ENG voice, why do I have to re-set Susan voice every time I want to listen instead of David (the 1st in the voices list)? 3rd, the reading voice should start from the top row visible on the screen, not at start of the entire doc.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16066501, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18093503, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Luracasmus, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Alexander Mosquera, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Shalom, el hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Anthony-S6, el hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por TyrellTheChaotic, el hace 3 mesesJust absolutely broken. I could no longer use Wikipedia because after a few lines the page would 404.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15552492, el hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por i18n, el hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por EchoBreez, el hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12148057, el hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Martijn Oud, el hace 4 mesesGreat idea, but execution is poor. Has too many issues, distractions (install on firefox banner when you've got it installed...) and weird features. Like how it doesn't play nice with Dark Reader and the useless but very prominent AI summary. For the last couple of weeks every article only has an intro and an "Oops something went wrong: 404" error so I finally switched to Modern for Wikipedia.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17741600, el hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17973426, el hace 5 meses