Good idea done wrong Puntuado con 2 de 5 estrellas

At last I've come to understand why NS kept on bugging me with weekly „major” updates.

Uninstalled it and waiting for a fork with good functionality and without all the annoyance. GPL FTW!

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.6). 

Puntuado con 3 de 5 estrellas

It is good to have deleted Filter from whitelist of ABP obediently.
But I will check it whenever NoScript and FlashGot are updated in future, whether there is not influence on ABP and other addon.
Because trust to the author was lost, the star three.
In other words does the development of NoScriptBlocker which NoScript does not allow to change setting of other Addon have not yet come?

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.6). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Awesome add-on, works perfectly.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.6). 

Do NOT read the crap written about NoScript Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

I'm a proud NoScript user, and all the crap that is written is irrational, and, dare I say, dumb. The story is long and has to sides, but the bottom-line is that NoScript IS to be trusted.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.6). 

Puntuado con 1 de 5 estrellas

Used to be a good addon, but recently the author has intentionally tried to get around the AdBlock Plus Easylist filterset's rules, and the latest version adds its own unwanted and unauthorized whitelist to Adblock Plus.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.5). 

dev started to do some sketchy things Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

like overs have said, WHY did noscript highjack and even TOUCH ABP (a different addon)

avoid this addon until its fixed, noscript has its purpose and ABP has theirs and thats to block ads, yes even yours my NoScript buddies

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.5). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Regarding ABP+ (hell it's even on Slashdot now), while I don't agree with NoScript's behaviour in any way, it is hilarious to ask people to boycott NoScript in typical fanboys' fashion, even though you may not have used it, or even know how to use it (like most others) before.
The developer is working on the code, and so will not be posting an apology, rebuttal or anything like that. Apparently there will be a prompt in the next release.
Let's just get this fixed quickly, have the dev say some words about it, and move on. Everyone's welcome to create a better alternative though.
I never expect to see this sort of overreaction on AMO...

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.4). 

Puntuado con 1 de 5 estrellas

I'm sorry Giorgio Maone, I've had a great deal of respect for you and the work you have done. But you got more and more aggressive with your making money off your work..so I slowly quit using your extension (and because it got to be a bit of a hassle to use IMO). But this latest move of yours was a big step over the line (toward the dark side if you will) and I can no longer even recommend anyone to use your extension. Your priorities have really gotten messed up. Modifying another extension purely for monetary gain with your 'security' extension is just beyond reprehensible.

I'm sorry man, you are going down a path I can not follow. Hope you come to your senses soon.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.4). 

Noscript Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

I am a proponent of "if is ain't broke, don't fix it". So for a long time, I used Adblock plus and flashblock. Well, with progress such as updates to Firefox, I find that each update eliminates a featured addon that I liked to have. So now I use adblock plus with Noscript and after a couple of "learning" sessions, I have things working the way that I want them to work. I have tried to upgrade to something above 2.0.0.18 but each step up eliminates features I really like. Sticking with 2.0.0.18 couple with adblock plus and noscript allows me to keep the other addons I want. Bottom line: Thanks to noscript and adblock plus for letting me keep the features it really enjoy.
Dale

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.4). 

Noscript Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

I am a proponent of "if is ain't broke, don't fix it". So for a long time, I used Adblock plus and flashblock. Well, with progress such as updates to Firefox, I find that each update eliminates a featured addon that I liked to have. So now I use adblock plus with Noscript and after a couple of "learning" sessions, I have things working the way that I want them to work. I have tried to upgrade to something above 2.0.0.18 but each step up eliminates features I really like. Sticking with 2.0.0.18 couple with adblock plus and noscript allows me to keep the other addons I want. Bottom line: Thanks to noscript and adblock plus for letting me keep the features it really enjoy.
Dale

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2.4). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

I've used NoScript for well over a year - or so. I've also read many of the comments regarding personal experiences. Of late many 'gripes' are often based on superficial and trivial observations about how the application (NoScript) works. Let me try and make this as abundantly clear so as 'non-techies' and 'techies' alike can understand it. If you have Mozilla FF installed on your computing system AND you regularly use Mozilla FF to surf the Internet AND you wish to cut your chances of clandestine (hidden) or otherwise attacks on your computer (to an absolute minimum) THEN you really SHOULD ONLY DO SO with NoScript added to the FF browser. This is NOT an "if or but" situation: if you care about system security as regards the Internet interfacing with your PC, then this is a 'no-brainer'. Anyone, who is aware of this year's "Pwn2own" Competition will understand that NO browser is a fortress unto itself - FF (unfortunately) falls into this category. Finally, to Giorgio: keep up the great work.!

Regards, I W K, BSc (Bachelor Computing Systems)

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

best script.... EVER

no really, i use it for years and couldnt live without it.

the simplistic whitelisting of javascript is the best thing that ever happened to any browser.

i used to run it with adblock, but that is not even needed.

keep up the great work

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 4 de 5 estrellas

It definitely helps tracking servers from following you, but...

Not having the ability to see what scripts are blocked is somewhat of a problem, especially since some sites use javascript for navigation/display. If you can see the scripts blocked, it would make it easier to enable scripts that aren't advertising services and keep unwanted ones disabled.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

The first add-on I always add. Must have. Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

If you check "https only" in the options, you will not be
able to enable scripts on non-https sites.
Be sure to look at the whitelists that come with it, see if you agree.
Thanks for a great Add-on!

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Super,specialy with AdBlock Plus!Thank you!

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Great Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Doesn't effect my regular browsing. Yet, if it does, it is one simple click to allow the java scripting I require. Great Addon!

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

BUT ... It's a love-hate relationship. Until I have a 36" monitor, maybe a pair, every line on a screen is valuable to me, and NoScript appears as a popup -no, I don't have an answer, other than the upper bar in the space that runs between Tools Help and the little m or left of leftmost bookmark bar ... ALSO - I never seem to know (sure it's my fault too) whether an id'd nasty is blocked or not -perhaps an option might be to feed fragged info back, as long as the page is needed, then snarl it further when one moves on - 'cause that's the other love/hate thing - sometimes I *want* to watch Ralph Spoilsport sell me a car, though most of the times I don't, so neither a standing white or blacklist work, nor does a (to me) big yellow bar. And sometimes figuring out what I can declare EVIL and still do business is near impossible! So, I try to figure out what's best for a page, go to the next page, and ZZZZT - naming conventions require either the same or different answers -Giorgio, I know it's the fault of the infostealers, not yours ... maybe a system that tracks itself the page you used, goes back randomly for a month and changes the data sought...
I'm going to keep it, it's the best thing out there, but, boy would I simply like to criminilize this form of UNREQUESTED Commercial Speech - this isn't some guy you can walk away from if he gets on your case, and he's not even transmitting data "speech" but committing the equivolent of theft of your info.

Could be worse - read the "Privacy" statement for Win-Player last night - and to "preserve the privacy(!!!!!) of sellers of music/video, it tells them what you're watching in case you've obtained it illegally. So No-Script it is, especially with almost-daily updates as Georgio tries his best to help us all!
The WTP

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

BUT ... It's a love-hate relationship. Until I have a 36" monitor, maybe a pair, every line on a screen is valuable to me, and NoScript appears as a popup -no, I don't have an answer, other than the upper bar in the space that runs between Tools Help and the little m or left of leftmost bookmark bar ... ALSO - I never seem to know (sure it's my fault too) whether an id'd nasty is blocked or not -perhaps an option might be to feed fragged info back, as long as the page is needed, then snarl it further when one moves on - 'cause that's the other love/hate thing - sometimes I *want* to watch Ralph Spoilsport sell me a car, though most of the times I don't, so neither a standing white or blacklist work, nor does a (to me) big yellow bar. And sometimes figuring out what I can declare EVIL and still do business is near impossible! So, I try to figure out what's best for a page, go to the next page, and ZZZZT - naming conventions require either the same or different answers -Giorgio, I know it's the fault of the infostealers, not yours ... maybe a system that tracks itself the page you used, goes back randomly for a month and changes the data sought...
I'm going to keep it, it's the best thing out there, but, boy would I simply like to criminilize this form of UNREQUESTED Commercial Speech - this isn't some guy you can walk away from if he gets on your case, and he's not even transmitting data "speech" but committing the equivolent of theft of your info.

Could be worse - read the "Privacy" statement for Win-Player last night - and to "preserve the privacy(!!!!!) of sellers of music/video, it tells them what you're watching in case you've obtained it illegally. So No-Script it is, especially with almost-daily updates as Georgio tries his best to help us all!
The WTP

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

De mais, me protege muito no Orkut recomendo a todos.


:D

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.2). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

I LOVE THIS! I am using this and ABP, I feel much more secure and my browser loads faster!!! Usually goes a tad slower with extensions but opposite in this case and whilst looks and feelings can be deceiving this does work, I'm an avid MySp*cer and with all the vids, photos, graphics etc some people have I am safer and CCleaner does not have as much kak to clean out so it definitely works! Thank you Mr Maone!

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.9.1.91).