Nice idea and implementation Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Thank you for fast respond.
I rated it by five stars because it really worth this.
I appreciate your irony and sence of humor, but let me explain in my hobbling English what I mean.
1. I understand, that to represent the result from several sites, the addon must collect all data from them, extract the needed part from each one, assembly the extracted data into one message block (even with voice abilities) etc. Obviously all this requires deep, thorough and complex parsing.
By I ment something else (I wrote - on own risk of user).
2. Now - what I ment.
2.1 The addon has excellent mechanism of sensoring - Ctrl and cursor on the chosen word. No highlighting, no clicking - simple and excellent!
2.2 The output doesn't open neither tab nor new window - this is the second strong advantage of addon.
On other side there are many ways to involve many search engines by given search pattern and search engine shortname, but it isn't so comfortable.
In other words user can define the url with search sign, for example, http://translate.google.com/#auto/ru/%s where %s is the sign of pattern itself.
2.3. So, if it is possible to use your addon as a shell, that will send the sensored by cursor+Ctrl word, involve the search engine by given by user url/urls and return the data in such honey way - it would be great!
Of course, for original set of sites it'll make parsing.
Moreover, if user will be able to assign shortcut to each profile the Ctrl will be reserved for original set, and other profiles will be involved by other shortcuts.You should understand, that your addon in addition to parsing intellect has a gold, fantastic shell that is worth to use more wide.Thank you.

Thank you, I got it :)

I understood your point (thank you again :) ), and I'll try to update KitaDic so that it can have a UI window for setting up user-definable sites. btw, last week my dev box had a HDD failure and things went slightly ugly - KitaDic source was on that HDD - and now everything came back to normal :) Cheers.

Nice idea and implementation Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Thank you.
Is it possible to customize the list of dictionaries and other sources - to create several profiles. Let say - Wiktionary.org, Wikipedia.org, Google dictionary, Answers.com, Naver and Daum is a default profile, but user can prepare its own list of sources (even not sources in English) on his own risk?
It should be transparen for KitaDic, is not?
But!!! In this case KitaDic turnes into universal definition tool not only for English users.
Only what user should prepare is such profiles with lists of urls and be able to switch among profiles.

Thank you for the idea

Thank you very much for the 5 stars.

Your idea sounds aspiring :)
To let users create their own "profiles" for websites other than Wiktionary.org, those user-created profiles need to perform parsing and cherry-picking from the websites of their choice, and that "performing" almost certainly involves some sort of programming. Probably you meant "developer-created profiles."
Anyway, it was an inspiring idea. To make that happen, KitaDic's structure should be upgraded.