Se valoró con 4,5 de 5
4,5 estrellas de 5
Se valoró con 5 de 5
273 revisiones
- por Rajmeister, el hace 3 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Usuario de Firefox 16228066, el hace 3 díasSe valoró con 2 de 5Ohne Whitelist macht dieses Add-on keinen Sinn, ist äusserst mühsam immer von Hand bei gewissen URLs das Add-On zu deaktivieren. Entwickler verspricht schon seit Monaten die Implementierung, bis heute gibt es immer noch keine Whitelist.
- por Usuario de Firefox 12704184, el hace 7 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Vodahmin, el hace 8 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Usuario de Firefox 14507602, el hace 9 díasSe valoró con 1 de 5Too many permissions with access to almost everything in the browser.
- por Usuario de Firefox 12466894, el hace 10 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5Bin sehr zufrieden - reinigt wie versprochen ! Danke
- por Usuario de Firefox 13004310, el hace 12 díasSe valoró con 4 de 5
- por Usuario de Firefox 16576312, el hace 13 díasSe valoró con 3 de 5The lack of whitelist is a huge problem. Please add!
- por Usuario de Firefox 13784235, el hace 14 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por ewser, el hace 14 díasSe valoró con 3 de 5Although the addon prevents useless "google.com/url?sa..." records in browser history, it triples records of visited urls, particularly google's search query urls while logged in. Because google adds it's parameters anyway, and each parameter creates new record. So it overloads my history and I can't use it no more untill it'll be fixed. Everything's ok only when I type queries in browser address bar.
- por What???, el hace 18 díasSe valoró con 1 de 5False claims (like the bogus positive reviews) by bots. Only strips urls about 25% of the time. For example, it won't strip the junk off this url: https://cnn.com/news/world/secret-service-purging-the-trump-loyalists-from-bidens-presidential-detail/wcm/71470dfa-5d0a-4897-abf4-9888e0e24c72. Everything after the word detail can be stripped, but it's not. Even when you enter the link manually.
If this extension doesn't clean the junk (based on the name) then change the dang name instead of confusing people.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 12 díasHi, thank you for your feedback. To address your first statement, as a student I, unfortunately, don't have enough money to buy bots.
Regarding the second statement, the CNN URL is indeed not cleaned. It's because there are no rules in our rules file for this kind of "garbage" yet. If you find URLs that are not cleaned, you can always report them via our website or email and we will add new rules for them. However, you will have to make use of this possibility. - por Usuario de Firefox 12597444, el hace 19 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Usuario de Firefox 13737162, el hace 20 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5This addon significantly improves the quality of my life. Every time I copy a link from my URL bar, it's nice and clean, and I am not being tracked from it. Fantastic add-on that works great. Especially useful for things like right clicking and copying links from a Google search result (even though I try my damnedest never to use Google's search engine anymore, preferring sites like Duck Duck Go).
- por Usuario de Firefox 13487679, el hace 21 díasSe valoró con 4 de 55 stars if possible to whitelist. A whitelist is mandatory for handling banking sites.
- por Usuario de Firefox 16348963, el hace 24 díasSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Usuario de Firefox 12776265, el hace un mesSe valoró con 4 de 5hello
could we have the possibility of deactivating it site by site? And with saving choices? - por Rodrigues, el hace un mesSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por dedmazai1870, el hace un mesSe valoró con 4 de 5Blocked video frame from at this link https://www.gazeta.ru/sport/news/2020/12/22/n_15394304.shtml?
frame link is https://vp.rambler.ru/player/0.2.19/iframe.html?sspJparams=%7B%22puid6%22%3A%22GAZETA_SPORT%22%2C%22puid10%22%3A%22NO%22%2C%22puid15%22%3A%22news%22%2C%22puid18%22%3A%22GAZETA_SPORT_NEWS%22%2C%22puid58%22%3A%22arshavin-andrey%22%2C%22puid59%22%3A%22covid%3Agc%22%2C%22puid59%22%3A%22zenit%3Aspartak%22%7D&id=1585257&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gazeta.ru%2Fsport%2Fnews%2F2020%2F12%2F22%2Fn_15394304.shtml%3F&aspectRatio=1.7777777777777777#widgetId=kizvw8mi.8w_1
And need a whitelist (as already suggested) - por Usuario de Firefox 15735666, el hace un mesSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por h0nd, el hace un mesSe valoró con 5 de 5Id expect the tracking elements of this URL to be removed by this extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/clearurls/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=featured
and change to:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/clearurls/
But it did not happen with this extension installed.
Same with following URL:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/get-started-firefox-overview-main-features?utm_source=desktop-snippet&utm_medium=snippet&utm_campaign=f100_week1_SUMOmainfeatures&utm_term=20603&utm_content=rel
Maybe I misunderstood or didnt configure correctly. idk.
edit: Dear Kevin R./developer, thank you for taking the time for this very well explanatory reply. since this issue was due to the browser itself, i changed the rating accordingly. thank you again!Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 12 díasHi, thank you for your feedback. You have understood the addon correctly. Actually, these tracking elements should be removed - and they usually are. However, there are technical restrictions from Mozilla for all URLs that belong to Mozilla/Firefox such as mozilla.com. These URLs must not and cannot be modified by any addon, so ClearURLs does not work on Mozilla/Firefox websites, but this is true for all addons.
You can deactivate these restrictions if you remove the affected URLs in the "about:config" from the "extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains" setting. - por Gokhlayeh, el hace un mesSe valoró con 5 de 5very useful but need two improvement:
-a whitelist (as already suggested)
-the chance to clean a URL since clicking on a mail without needing to refresh the page - por Usuario de Firefox 16042805, el hace un mesSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Petr Zelenin, el hace un mesSe valoró con 5 de 5
- por Usuario de Firefox 16124451, el hace 2 mesesSe valoró con 1 de 5