Revisiones de Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike por Dmitry Selivanov
4,736 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por aUser, el hace 18 horas
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por petethecanuck, el hace 19 horasgreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Sweet Citrus, el hace 19 horas[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17708027, el hace 4 díasПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Zelgadis-San, el hace 6 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Juraj Mäsiar, el hace 10 díasThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13519206, el hace 11 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18900251, el hace 11 díasThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 11 díasI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Riku70X, el hace 14 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por malisipi, el hace 15 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por placidtea, el hace 16 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Spigot, el hace 16 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dale Cooper, el hace 17 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18909402, el hace 17 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Kiwi18, el hace 18 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15889624, el hace 19 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Cameron Owens, el hace 20 díasI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 19 díasGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por kuroten, el hace 21 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Nicky McCurdy, el hace 22 díasThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18144459, el hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19547104, el hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por qawas, el hace 23 díasStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 23 díasMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 6120711, el hace 24 díasasking for premium for such a simple addon
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 23 díasMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por Chantelle, el hace 24 díasThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 23 díasYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.