Revisiones de JShelter
JShelter por Libor Polčák
49 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Cold Clown, hace 2 mesesIf you value your online privacy, seriously consider this extension. The author(s) have released this to address four threats we all face online: user tracking, overly-capable browser APIs, local network scanning, and microarchitectural attacks.
If you use uBO, you owe it to yourself to use this as well to protect you from first-party fingerprinting and tracking! - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Bill 47, hace 3 mesesI really appreciate what this extension does behind the scenes i salute 🫡 the developer n will get behind the program.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por ItsMeSebi, hace 6 mesesThe only extension that really safely alters your fingerprint on Firefox. Highly recommended as an addition to your adblocker and strict tracking protection in Firefox
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ryan Steed, hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dio, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Mushrooms, hace 2 añosI use this with custom settings (see below) in combination with CanvasBlocker to make my browser extremely resistant to fingerprinting well maintaining web functionality. I also highly recommend using LocalCDN to reduce tracking. Check out the add-on CloudHole by scakemyer if CloudFlare is a issue or your running a VPN but I usually have no issues.
JSHelter Settings: ibb. co
/8KyKQ5v
CanvasBlocker Settings (edit .txt to
.json): pastebin .com
/YMWrxu99 - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Flowerpot, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por What???, hace 2 añosExtremely complex but the only working fingerprint spoofing extension out there now that the original Fingerprint Spoofing extension/add-on has been removed from Github because later reiterations are malware and developer has stopped supporting it more than 5 years ago. On Firefox, but not Chrome it ramps up CPU usage and RAM.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosThe CPU and RAM usage should be signifficantly lower startng from 0.19.1 that is just released. Please let us know if you observe issues in 0.19.1. We prefer the issue tracker or email jshelter@gnu.org. - Se valoró con 3 de 5por RYX, hace 2 añosThe fingerprint protection this offers is comprehensive and is the only one that I have encountered that protects against the "Creepjs" fingerprinter.
I have tested it against multiple other sites like browserleaks and fingerprint/demo.
HOWEVER, about half the internet does not work with this extension because CloudFlare blocks you with a message "This Browser Is Out of Date" which makes you turn off the extension. If you can fix that issue, I'll mark this to 5 stars.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosCan you try the following?
* Click on JShelter badge icon -> click "Global settings" in the popup.
* You should see the option page
* Locate "Fingerprint Detector" section neear the bottom of the page.
* Click "Manage exception list ⤵" (it should be the lowest button on the page).
* Add "challenges.cloudflare.com" to the list.
* Click "JS Shield details" in the menu
* On the top, add "challenges.cloudflare.com" and select "Turn JavaScript Shield off" (or test other level if you see fit).
Try to visit the affected page and report back if you were successful (for example to jshelter@gnu.org). I think that this is a good candidate for a FAQ entry. - Se valoró con 4 de 5por BaraShiro, hace 2 años(Updated 24-09-24) Very powerful but complex tool. Defeats fingerprinting, but requires some tinkering in order to not break almost every page on the internet. The memory issues seems to be fixed in version 0.19.1.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosThe CPU and RAM usage should be signifficantly lower startng from 0.19.1 that is just released. Please let us know if you observe issues in 0.19.1. We prefer the issue tracker or email jshelter@gnu.org. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por Adrian F., hace 2 añosI had to disable this after the upgrade to Firefox 125.0.1 because it caused very high CPU (100%) and RAM (20G+) usage for multiple hours, without end. I used about:memory to discover that this was the culprit. After I disabled JShelter, the CPU usage and RAM dropped.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosThe CPU and RAM usage should be signifficantly lower startng from 0.19.1 that is just released. Please let us know if you observe issues in 0.19.1. We prefer the issue tracker or email jshelter@gnu.org. - Se valoró con 4 de 5por ti-ap, hace 3 añosA great tool that everyone should be using, even if it's not perfect. I recommend it to anyone that will listen. On rare occasions some sites will break because they're using a really aggressive captcha or spam detection platform. Lowering the settings on JShelter and refreshing fixes this. I also disagree that notifications should be shown by default, if at all. Every site is using fingerprinting of some sort nowadays, so you just get a notification every time you go to a site and the notifications become noise.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por wн|τεbʁeλÐe®i5βaЯ1εy, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por JCD, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Oliver Salzburg, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por geeknik, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Andreas, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Viking Helmet, hace 4 añosAs much as I appreciate the concept behind this and would like to give it a higher rating, it breaks too many websites and virtually anything that uses CAPTCHA. I'll continue to keep it around, but some sites will flat-out ignore your request and others will fail to verify your humanity while it's enabled.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por mirkl, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Poligraf Poligrafovich Bouboulov, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Cirnos, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13482869, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por zaskock, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Snehal Shekatkar, hace 4 años