Revisiones de Double-click Image Downloader
Double-click Image Downloader por Marnes
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 14331484
Se valoró con 5 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 14331484, el hace 7 años189 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por edenflare, el hace 3 horasDoesn't have a convert filetype on double click to say set default to .png, and also skips a double click so no spamming. Kinda useless these days.
Edit update-
Your toilet analogy isnt the same thing when it comes to image downloading, you need to think outside of the box, if I can double click and download images, why not have it also convert, to make my addon superior than the rest? Or even better why not download all images or mp4's on a webpage with one click? And be even more superior have everyone rate you 5 stars then you will likely get more people buying you a coffee instead of just being a basic double click image with a mandatory file type.
I wish you well and if you did implement this instant 5 stars I'll check back every year or so ready to put it upto 5 stars.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 horasIt's an image downloader, not a converter. Do you give your dishwasher 1 star ratings just for not being a toilet too? This isn't how reviews work. I'm not sure what you mean with the skipping/spamming part unfortunately, but this addon is no longer being updated anyway.
Update: that's neither how software works (feature slop and scope creep) nor how ratings work. I get that you'd like conversion too but it's simply not a goal for this addon. Reviews are primarily meant to tell other users how well an addon does what it promises to do, not to solely make random demands. 1 star nornally means the entire addon is unfinished garbage full of bugs and bad results. If an addon works fine but you just wish it had some extra bells and whistles, that's more reasonably 4 or maybe 3. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19244078, el hace un mesAmazing add on..i recommend this to all...can download so many videos on various sites.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13790370, el hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por FL015CH, el hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13323778, el hace 7 mesesGreat addon, if it could support custom download location it would be 5 star.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Gwarchdodwr Tir NaNog, el hace 10 mesesProbably one of the most useful extensions to Firefox that I've ever downloaded. Thank you.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 11900036, el hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Bhargav Ram, el hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12759533, el hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Alex Pedruzzi, el hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Poltava, el hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por yensama, el hace un año
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosAs mentioned many times before (I should add this to the FAQ part), it depends on the website, this observation is not global. Many servers provide filename extensions one way or another, but e.g. twitter doesn't in any way (because websites don't need to) and my addon can't just take a wild guess as it. There will be an extension if the extension is communicated by the server as per standards. What a blown-out-of-proportion thing to give a permanent 1 star for anyway, as if that's all there is to it and as if it's any addon's fault a server decides not to expose extensions. Stupid "reviews" - more like baseless whines - like this are why I'm done developing for the public anyway.- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18347152, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14624091, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por ProtonLover, el hace 2 añosOnly site this doesn't work on is pixiv is there a workaround at all if so? getting SERVER_FORBIDDEN
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoSorry, they probably detect hotlinking (i.e. direct downloading) specifically to stop addons like this. Thank you for giving a reasonable rating to a functioning product, unlike all the petulant reviewers that go straight to 1 star for the silliest reasons as if it's a completely defective piece of junk. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por diego.ar, el hace 2 años
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosSome websites do things to stop addons like this from working, and I can't change that. But the addon definitely works on sites that don't take such countermeasures. I use it myself in the latest firefox, as do many other happy reviewers. Don't use reviews for misplaced and false bug reports, they belong in an email with proper information like which site you're trying to use it on. Simply writing "doesn't work" is an utter waste of everyone's time and blatantly wrong.- Se valoró con 1 de 5por ragernothingworks, el hace 2 añosIt just does not work, you can click all you like, it won't download on Firefox.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosSorry but I'm using firefox and this addon myself, and it definitely works, as it does for other people too. There are some sites that do things that prevent addons like this from working (e.g. clickable overlays on images), you may be trying to use it on such a site. Fair enough it doesn't work then but that's no basis to say this addon never works. Please use reviews only for serious, well prepared review content. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17999994, el hace 2 añosamazing does exactly what it says the hover button works best for my use case!
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Chillsaw, el hace 2 años