Add extra features and styles to make SeaMonkey your own.Close
|User since||October 20, 2011|
|Number of add-ons developed||0 add-ons|
|Average rating of developer's add-ons||Not yet rated|
this add-on does not work for me. i tested it with the url that the author supplied in the add-on's announcement. the add-on may conflict with other add-ons i use (noscript,requestpolicy,ghostery). i hope the developer can look into this, since i would like to see a working solution to this redirect nonsense
thx for looking into the cited issues.
the new version makes no difference, even when disabling requestpolicy, noscript and ghostery.
I know it has a problematic reputation but you can opt out of the tracking .
I'm also using adblock but there are some pages where adblock is not enough and ghostery quiet nicely cleans what adblock does not get .
great add-on. would be nice if it had an option to remove cookie on user specified pages/tabs after a certain amount of time has passed even if the page/tab is not closed, e.g. delete cookie on specified pge every 5 min.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.4.3.1-signed).
sadly this add-on does not work
this add-on works by making your screen information unavailable,, which is not bad. but i guess the add-on would be more effective if it would allow the user to fake the screen information. hopefully such an option can be added to this add-on.
does what it says (adding an extra layer of obfuscation)
a useful add-on for the privacy conscious. it makes it harder to fingerprint your browser. what could be improved though, would be to have the icon of the add-on not show up in the add-on bar or at least make it removable.
asides from this,it would be nice to have a similar add-on that helps to obfuscate the screen size category in the panopticon test
great add-on, though it would be even greater if the scroll buttons would also appear on the page that the add-on superstart creates. it would be even greater if the button would appear on the page that the brief feed reader add on creates (the address of that page is chrome://brief/content/brief.xul)This review is for a previous version of the add-on (220.127.116.11-signed).
useful add-on, that works
nice add-on, that works. what i would like to see added would be an option to give or deny permissions on a site specific basis, or to put it in other words a whitelist and or blacklist function.
a useful add-on that works fine. here are some suggestions to make it better:
it would be nice if there was an option to switch the default state of the button to off, another nice option would be if you could make the button show per default only on certain sites via something like whitelist. also the button does not show up in the tab of the brief add-on (its address is something like chrome://brief/content/brief.xul), therefore it would be great if this ad-on would work with the brief add-on.
great addon, but after the latest stylish release the export to stylish does not work anymore, hope this can be fixed
edit. thx for the beta , it works
I'm a die-hard brief user, who had no problems with brief so far. what made me try out digest was the new privacy feature (suppression of scripts). I like that feature and think I'll keep digest. hope to see some more privacy related features. also: a feature to select multiple feed articles to move, mark or delete them (like in an email program (e.g. the checkboxes in thunderbird ) would be a nice enhancement. anyway, keep up the good work!
An option to easily select/erase multiple messages at once would be a nice. Other than that it is a nearly a perfect feed reader!This review is for a previous version of the add-on (18.104.22.168-signed). This user has a previous review of this add-on.
the best cookie extension for fx imhoThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.4.1-signed).
thx for this useful add-on!This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.1.1-signed).
The new beta that you can only find on the request policy homepage has become highly user friendly, keep up the good work!This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.5.27.1-signed). This user has a previous review of this add-on.
works great, thx a lot
thx for this useful add-onThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.2.1.1-signed). This user has a previous review of this add-on.
wonderful add-on, that gets constantly improvedThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (22.214.171.124-signed).
nice for another layer of obfuscationThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.0.1).