Gerhard

About me

Developer Information
Name Gerhard
User since April 20, 2012
Number of add-ons developed 0 add-ons
Average rating of developer's add-ons Not yet rated

My Reviews

Bamboo Feed Reader

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

When importing feeds from another reader, the feeds are not in alphabetical order as in the actual reader.

Is this a bug or what goes wrong?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.1.1.1-signed).  This user has 2 previous reviews of this add-on.

Brief

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Ich finde, dass der Abruf neuer Feedeinträge viel zu langsam ist und würde mir wünschen, dass diese Geschwindigkeit nachhaltig gesteigert wird.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.7.3.1-signed).  This user has 6 previous reviews of this add-on.

Bamboo Feed Reader

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

How stable does the version 2.1beta4 work? Are there any experiences?

Thank you for feedback

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.0.3.1-signed).  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

Brief

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Hello Adam,

is there the possiblilty of accelerating the speed, when recalling new feed contents?

Best regards
Gerhard

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.7.2.1-signed).  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

Feedly - Beyond Google Reader

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

There are more than 18.000 users wishing feedly in a webbased version. And I ask the feedly-team:

Why do you not offer a webbased version?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (14.0.482.1-signed).  This user has a previous review of this add-on.

Feedly - Beyond Google Reader

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Is there already a webbased version of feedly?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (10.2.1-signed). 

Bamboo Feed Reader

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Ich hätte gerne eine webbasierte Version des Bamboo Feed Readers. Wäre das möglich, Fray?

I´d like to have a webbased version of Bamboo Feed Reader. Could you realize that, Fray?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.7.4.1-signed). 

Brief

Update-Autor Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Mich würde interessieren, von wem das Update realisiert worden ist.
Und in diesem Zusammenhang ebenso die Frage: Inwiefern ist sicher gestellt, dass Brief künftig gepflegt, d.h. mit Updates versorgt wird?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.1.1-signed).  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

Brief

That is correct Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I absolutely agree with Degit >>> BRIEF IS DEAD, DO NOT INSTALL IT!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.5.4.1-signed).  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

ScribeFire Next

Waiting for the next update Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Hello mdrouin,

the last update was on Octobre 23, 2011.
When will there be the next update?

Best thanks for your answer
Gerhard

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (4.0.1-signed). 

Brief

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

My urgent appeal to Adam Kowalczyk (developer of this add-on Brief):

Please show your true colours. Will you continue developing Brief or won´t you.

You owe your Brief users a binding answer!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.5.4.1-signed).  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

Brief

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I have updaated to Firefox 12. And the fixed version 1.5.4 of Nikouf works in this version of Firefox.
The question, that remains. "How long will it work?"

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.5.4.1-signed).  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

Brief

What bug was fixed? Rated 1 out of 5 stars

@Nikouf,

what concret bug did you fix?
Is your version more stable than the developper´s version 1.6b1?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.5.4.1-signed).