About me

Developer Information
Name jsmithson
User since September 9, 2012
Number of add-ons developed 0 add-ons
Average rating of developer's add-ons Not yet rated

My Reviews

CanIUse Search Bar

Useless, always wrong Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I use many search engines in my Firefox search bar. They all work well except this one. It _always_ takes me to the wrong page in CanIUse.com. I've tried surrounding the search term in quotes but it doesn't help. This is completely useless and I've removed it from my search list.

Now I just go to CanIUse with an ordinary bookmark, and use their built-in search box at the top of the page, which works fine.


Still works in FF42 for me... Rated 5 out of 5 stars


Scrapbook is still working for me in Firefox 42 (on a Mac). I don't have it installed in my VMs so I don't know about Windows or Linux compatibility.

I suppose if you were desperate, you might be able to transfer your Scrapbook data folder to a Mac and run FF+Scrapbook from there. Also it's much easier to print almost anything to a PDF on a Mac (that's built-in to the printing routines), so you might save your data that way.

I haven't installed FF43 which came out recently -- has anybody tried to run Scrapbook there?

Private Tab

Tracking protection - which pages? Rated 5 out of 5 stars

@ -1:

I didn't know about clicking the address icon, but now that I try it... I'm seeing approximately the opposite of what you're reporting. Firefox is telling me that Tracking Protection is working for _all_ pages that have tracking elements (including this one), whether they're private windows, private tabs... or ordinary (not private) windows or tabs!

Maybe there's some about:config settings that affect this? Or might the FF alert be feeding off the anti-tracking filter installed in AdBlock Plus or some other extension? Seems unlikely... Moz said they were adding anti-tracking to private windows, not for _all_windows. I have no idea what's going on here.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (  This user has a previous review of this add-on.

Private Tab

Tip and Question Rated 5 out of 5 stars

wongchunwai said: "its really great. would be prefect if private mode trun on automatically by detecting predefined url/domain."

It does. From the (very limited) documentation: "Also you can create private bookmarks to always open some links in private tabs: just append “private:” before URL, example: private:https://addons.mozilla.org/"

Question: In the newest Firefox 42.0, they've added some anti-tracking features to private windows. I assume that works in private tabs too, but I'm not sure. Does anybody know?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on ( 

Menu Filter

Didn't do anything Rated 1 out of 5 stars

After my disaster yesterday wasting hours configuring Menu Wizard, only to discover it was too buggy to use, I decided to try Menu Filter. All it claims to do is remove items (far less powerful than Menu Editor or Menu Wizard), but I figured it was better than nothing.

Nothing, unfortunately, is exactly what it did. I'm running the current Mac Firefox 40.0.3. Menu Filter's interface is dead-simple (i.e. the opposite of Menu Wizard) so it took only moments to learn how to use it. I told it to turn off (hide) two items in the File menu: Email Link... and Work Offline. The items were grayed out in Menu Filter's window, but were still visible in Firefox's File menu.

So I quit and relaunched Firefox just to be sure. Same story -- Menu Filter claimed to have hidden the items, but they're still there.

So I judge this extension useless, and uninstalled it. I didn't bother trying it in my Windows 7 copy of Firefox; maybe it would work there?

So as of now, I still have no reliable, usable way to edit the menu structure of Firefox. Even Microsoft Word lets me do that!


This review is for a previous version of the add-on (8.1-signed). 


Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Although the extension says it's signed, I'm seeing this alert in the FF list: "ColorZilla could not be verified for use in Firefox." I think that means it will break soon... are other users seeing this in their Add-Ons page (extensions list)?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.8.1-signed). 


Broken in Firefox 36? Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Has anyone been able to get version to work in Firefox 36? (I'm on a Mac, but I doubt that matters.) This used to work really well, but since I updated Firefox all it shows is a blank window. :(

This review is for a previous version of the add-on ( 

Dafizilla ViewSourceWith

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

How did you upgrade this to The link here _downgraded_ me to a very old version, 0.7.4. It also wiped out all my settings for the extension. In fact if I hover over the download button, and read the whole long URL, it clearly points to version 0.7.4. I also couldn't find the current version on the developer's own page.

This extension is critical to my workflow. It's also been the biggest PITA of any extension I use, year after year, often wiping out its own preferences. But this "upgrade" to an ancient version is the absolute pits!

Again -- if it worked for you -- specifically, _how_ did you get version Thanks.

This user has 3 previous reviews of this add-on.

Font Finder

Shows wrong rendered font Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This extension is worse than useless because, although it shows the correct font stack, it can actually show the wrong rendered font.

For example, I have a stack that starts with Georgia, Times, etc... This extension claims that the font actually rendered is Times, but that's simply untrue; Georgia is available and is being rendered. Although they're fairly similar fonts, I know the difference between the two -- just zoom in on a lower-case "i" or "j" and it's obvious. (I used to teach typographic design.) Anyway, just to make sure I wasn't making a mistake, I checked it against a font book. I wasn't wrong; the extension was.

I don't know what the problem is with this extension. Might it be because I'm using an older version of Mac OSX? (Snow Leopard, 10.6.8.) Hard to believe that would matter... and if there's a compatibility issue, it should just refuse to work at all. Anyway, until they correct this bug, I advise people to avoid it because it could confuse you big-time.

By the way, they do seem to have fixed the entirely different problem I reported back in 2012, in my prior 1-star review. I thought I'd give this another chance now. Oh well.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (  This user has a previous review of this add-on.

Dafizilla ViewSourceWith

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

WARNING: This extension does not work with Firefox 36. It throws the following error:

viewPage: [Exception... "Not enough arguments [nsIWebBrowserPersist.saveURI]" nsresult: "0x80570001 (NS_ERROR_XPC_NOT_ENOUGH_ARGS)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://viewsourcewith/content/urldownloader.js :: ViewSourceWithUrlDownloader.prototype.internalSaveURI :: line 134" data: no]

I've rolled back Firefox to an earlier version; I can't give up this extension for my development work. Anyone know how to actually contact the developer, or whether he has any plans to update this?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (  This user has other reviews of this add-on.


Useless Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Basically useless, because it shows the same never-changing, totally absurd date/timestamp for each item. Also has only one timestamp, not two like the original CacheViewer. Also has an obnoxious huge ?DONATE? button that you can't get rid of.

There are one or two minor added features, but overall this thing is too clunky and buggy to use. The original CacheViewer is pretty poor, but this is even worse.

Dafizilla ViewSourceWith

No contact; does it work in FF35? Rated 4 out of 5 stars

The developer's "Contact" link on SourceForge leads to an error page; that, plus the fact this hasn't been updated in quite a while, looks bad. On Mac FF 34 it does what I need (links devel web pages to the actual source HTML file on the devel server) -- I don't care about opening CSS or JS files with this (I do that through my IDE after I get the HTML page open). Does anybody know whether this can still link web pages to HTML server source in FF35, especially Mac FF35? Anybody know if the developer is still alive? Thanks.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (  This user has other reviews of this add-on.

Link Visitor 3

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

This used to work fine, but now (in Mac Firefox 34.0) its items are no longer visible in the context menu when I right-click a link. The Menu Editor extension (which always worked fine with this) can't see these items either. The only way this works now is as a toolbar button, and that just lets you toggle *all* links, not just individual links like before. Please fix this!


Rated 3 out of 5 stars

JSOff used to work fine in Mac Firefox, then disappeared no matter what I did. It took me an hour or two to find out what was going on.

I'm still running Firefox 28 (purposely) in both Mac (Snow Leopard) and in Windows 7. JSOff 1.02 still works fine in Windows 7 FF28, but doesn't show up at all, anywhere, in Mac FF28. The Add-Ons Manager shows it as "installed" and active, but there's no button and no way to access it (even during the toolbar "Customize" routine). I even created a new, blank profile in case there was an extensions conflict; made no difference.

I was luckily able to roll back JSOff to the previous version (1.01) and now it works on my Mac again. I guess the developer never bothered testing version 1.02 in Mac Firefox 28.

This user has a previous review of this add-on.


Rated 3 out of 5 stars

I agree with AlenFox. The button in the bottom toolbar is frozen in one position. "Customize..." lets me move most icons where I like, but not this one. Its position is non-customizable in both Mac Firefox and Windows Firefox, although in a slightly different way. In both Firefoxes, I use Status-4-Evar to control the bottom toolbar, if that matters (I doubt that it does). Other than that, it's a very convenient little accessory.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.15.1-signed.1-signed). 

Littlefox for Firefox

No longer works right Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Littlefox worked well for me (on a Mac) up through Firefox 20. Unfortunately, it no longer works right in Firefox 21.

There's now an ugly horizontal line right under all the toolbar icons, even going right through the icons in some cases.

Worse than that, this theme now adds two extra icons (or causes them to be visible) at the right end of whichever toolbar is at the top of the window: an icon to go fullscreen, and an icon to close the window. They're not actually attached to any toolbar, since they appear even if you close all toolbars; they seem to be attached to the window itself. To me they're just redundant clutter, since they're duplicating standard-Mac items that are at the top left of every window.

Sadly, I have to disable Littlefox in Mac Firefox 21.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.0.16). 

Dafizilla ViewSourceWith

Mozilla page is not current Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Anyone know why Mozilla doesn't update this page? I have ViewSourceWith version 0.9.3, which I got from the developer's own website... not the old version I see listed here. The current version works fine with Firefox 18. People are getting the wrong impression from this outdated download link and the outdated "no longer works" reviews.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on ( 

Font Finder

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I'm using Mac Firefox. Until recently, Font Finder worked fine. In the newest version of Mac Firefox (15.0.1), however, Font Finder only works the first time I use it after launching Firefox. After that, the extension doesn't work. I have to quit and re-launch Firefox each time I want to use Font Finder -- which obviously makes Font Finder completely impractical to use. The highlighting (of the extension's icon, if clicked on, and the text) seems normal, but no informational box pops up at all. Nothing. It (mis)behaves the same way regardless of whether I use the Font Finder contextual menu or the toolbar icon. A shame, really; it was great when it worked.

Does the developer test this in the Mac version? Of course it's possible there's some conflict with another extension I run, since I do run a bunch. Any suggestions would be appreciated; I miss this extension.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.0.1-signed).