|User since||February 5, 2011|
|Number of add-ons developed||0 add-ons|
|Average rating of developer's add-ons||Not yet rated|
Rated 1 out of 5 stars
The addon is good but should be re-coded by the author, since by the moment it consumes to much memoryThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (126.96.36.199-signed).