|User since||March 5, 2007|
|Number of add-ons developed||0 add-ons|
|Average rating of developer's add-ons||Not yet rated|
Linux 64 Bit - I don't understand the answer Rated 2 out of 5 stars
what has a newer version for Windows to do with the missing Linux x86_64? i am using 64bit-only Systems and only Linux for at least 7 years now including that addon *but* for x86_64 you always needed to use the upstream version, no problem so far, but when signed addons get mandatory it becomes a serious problemThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.9.5.8.1-signed). This user has 2 previous reviews of this add-on.
Linux64 "Not available for your platform" but upstream it is? Rated 2 out of 5 stars
why in the world is the new, now signed addon not available for Linux 64bit while the same version, unsigned and upstream is available?This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.9.5.8.1-signed). This user has other reviews of this add-on.
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
With the lastest version fixing the BCC and encryption issue another *MAJOR BUG* was introduced - every time you write a new message with a BCC and without *ever* use encryption you are asked how to handle the BCC adress and obviously encrypt the message get selected - please respect the global settings for sign onlyThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.7.2).
the icon :-( Rated 5 out of 5 stars
a really great extension for server-admins! but please make the icon more smaller than in 0.66 or at least respect the "small icons" preferences of the user, it should be really small and not dominate the UI this way
AES128-GCM -> what the previous poster said!
admins which are knowing what they are doing still have ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 as the first preferred cipher and only the clients are way behind while SMTP-server are far ahead in this context
1.8 broken Rated 2 out of 5 stars
CPU USAGE Rated 1 out of 5 stars
WTF - HOW CAN A RSS-READER CHECKING FOR CHANGES ONLY EVERY 5 MINUTES CONSUME UP TO 30% CPU ON A Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz - WHAT DOES THE SOFTWARE ALL THE TIME?This review is for a previous version of the add-on (220.127.116.11-signed). This user has other reviews of this add-on.
CPU-USAGE UNACCEPTABLE Rated 4 out of 5 stars
the reader is fine
but how the hell is it possible that thunderbird eats up to 28% CPU all the time on a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
this is UNACCEPTABLE, this is WASTING of ressources and from the view of a developer laughable - the feedsa re refresehed ina interval and between the refreshs the extension MUST NOT USE any CPU
Firefox 12 :-( Rated 5 out of 5 stars
does also not work with FF12 as with FF11
and no the versions on googlecode are also completly outdated and will not work in FF11/FF12 packages of Fedora (x86_64)
cooler, aber Optik Rated 5 out of 5 stars
Aber grauenhafte Optik mit dem riesigen, blauen und noch dazu noch unterstrichenen Link
Ein Button "Abmelden" mit einer kurzen Rückfrage (die generell eine gute Idee wäre wenn der Header auf eine Website zeigt, wir senden zB Newsletter mit eigener Software und schalten da keine Rückfragen und Formulare dazwischen) im Stil von "Antworten", "Liste antworten"... wäre hier deutlich vorteilhafter und würde vor allem in der Höhe im Vorschufenster weniger Platz brauchen
FF 11 needs a update! Rated 5 out of 5 stars
great exetension but does no longer work in FF11 :-(This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.0.1-signed.1-signed).
update-timelines Rated 1 out of 5 stars
the extension is really nice but useless if we can not install firefox-security updates over days and weeks without lose the access to our passwords because the extension is not made comaptible
I know that nozilla is forcing this, but this does not change the fact that no access to passwords or no security-update is not acceptable and this is the only extension which did not work until i had to decide switch back to ff's native store
Firefox 8 Rated 5 out of 5 stars
yes it is a must-have for kde-users and i do not understand why instead useless crap like "personas" such things are not included in the core instead destroy them permanently with the new rapid release
the same here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/
as linux-users you are fucked with the new release schedules because now there are no security-fixes for 7.x and i CAN NOT upgrade to 8.x until my extensions are working
mozilla lost to understand what users are needing and is on the way to destroy the biggest strength of their software called EXTENSIONS permanently
0.12 = 0.11 not works with FF7 here Rated 5 out of 5 stars
on the website i found "0.12" si out now, but even if i change the 0.11 link to 0.12 i get 0.11 which installs BUT it does not find currently stored passwords on Fedora 15 / KDE 4.7.1
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0
dump major-version-race Rated 5 out of 5 stars
can mozilla please stop this idiotic major-version-race with no benefit
no normal-user is interested in this number and it makes only troubles
with extensions and will possible lead that extension-developer raise
the max-version to FF 20
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
this iditotic jumping from 4->5->6 even for security updates of firefox is unacceptable as long you have no access to your stored passwords for days after that :-(This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.10). This user has other reviews of this add-on.
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
firefox5 support is hardly needed
the new versioning model of mozilla is really a problem with extensions
great but 0.6 loses passwords Rated 5 out of 5 stars
0.4 from mozilla.org works fine
0.6 from homepage is buggy like hell and losing passwords
checksum error version 0.10 Rated 5 out of 5 stars
Version 0.10 seems to have an package-error, trying to install over 0.8 will result in a checksum-error.
The automatic update will no work until beta-status is over
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
It works very nice at fedora9 kde4, but the font is much smaller as kde-fonts and also as gtk-fonts
btw: you should make the back-button a litte smaller to optimize the height of the toolbar seeing more content