Wack reviews, for what looks like a well-constructed add-on. Rated 5 out of 5 stars

There are two, or three reviews written after the comment about the add-on not working as intended - where the author replied that he will investigate - which have rated the add-on lower. Why is this allowed, for the add-on marks to be lower, just because some people aren't bothered to read before spewing out their gibberish?.. Good luck with the development, waiting on a new version; Tnx. :)

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (