Excillent Rated 5 out of 5 stars

thanks

Does what it says Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Tried other addons, finally this worked

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

does what it should and helps during development.

Feature request Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Please add JsonPath tester feature

Nice Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Overall, a nice add-on. But I don't like the expand icons.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

An invaluable part of my dev tooling

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Great! A better way to understand any json. But I miss an anchor for links. It's quite annoying to copy and paste the url.

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

не хватает кнопки отключения плагина для текущей вкладки.
Не интуитивно понятно, что ctrl+s сохранит row-format (оригинальный ответ сервера, а не отформатированный)

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Better formatting than with other editors I have. Page (local) was slow to load.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Does it what says and made the mess of text I had readable.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I like thise addon! I advise everyone, it is very convenient.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

nice addon, but the options panel in Firefox Aurora for Android v28.02a2 are not displaying properly.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Just awesome.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

has problem Rated 3 out of 5 stars

useful, but it will cause my CPU fully work when drag a tab to another window.(can't recur that in other profiles)

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

breaks Social API Rated 3 out of 5 stars

As long as this add-on is installed and activated, you can't use Facebook Messenger via the Social API. Otherwise, this is nice.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Very useful addon
You just installed it - no restart - and there you go...

Thanks a lot

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.6.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Easy add-on Rated 4 out of 5 stars

"data:application/json" and all inclusive.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.5.1-signed.1-signed). 

SeaMonkey Mail window - bank status bar Rated 4 out of 5 stars

For some reason interferes with the SeaMonkey Mail window status bar - making it blank (no components visible), but otherwise is a nice utility. The restart-less install is very convenient.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.3.1-signed.1-signed). 

Thanks for the information, you can track progress on the bug at https://code.google.com/p/jsonovich/issues/detail?id=31 (includes workaround until the next release).

this is a great json add on Rated 5 out of 5 stars

it's a great add for json users. you should install it

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.3.1-signed.1-signed). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Its not working on responses from Facebook's ajax pages...
They give responses back that start with "for (;;);<actual JSON>" which breaks JSON.parse().
Perhaps you can somehow check for this kind of invalid json?
PS: im using 1.9.3

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.9.2.1-signed.1-signed). 

I'm not familiar with Facebook's numerous APIs (and their documentation pages insisting I login isn't very nice), if you like you can file an issue over on our Google Code project - then when I finish work on it, you'll be kept up to date. If you could mention a URL to test with (or if that would also require a login, attach a saved copy instead), that would be most useful.

In any case, this will require work I've yet to do for supporting JSON-P content (issue 13) - if I make that modular enough, adding support for this specific invalid JSON shouldn't be too difficult.