|User since||June 23, 2007|
|Number of add-ons developed||0 add-ons|
|Average rating of developer's add-ons||Not yet rated|
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
I guess this extension is unnecessary now (because of the zoom functionality inherent to Firefox) but I'm so used to it now that I had to reinstall it.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.3.1).
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
My Request is to make this extension work with "repagination" and "antipagination" (addons 2099 and 7772 respectively).
It would be great to save multipages in one. For that specific function the old "Save page as" still beats this extension!
(I'm not a developer but i'm guessing that is because the Firefox save function reads from the computer memory and this extension saves from the server hosting the page)
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
It would be great if someone would pick this one up and kept developing it. Even take care of the memory leak pointed out by the original developer (that is now doing "Antipagination"). I am using the version linked by Orehp (thank you Orehp).This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2006.4.5).
Is it still needed with Firefox 3? Rated 4 out of 5 stars
I thought that with Firefox 3 that had been taken care of.
Can you point me somewhere where I can check the difference it makes in having this extension installed?
Needs a revision Rated 3 out of 5 stars
Great looking theme but needs some tweaking done, as my "Bookmarks Toolbar" doesn't show any favicons when I use this theme.
To save space I usually delete the name of the links in my Bookmark Toolbar and have only the icon to guide me. Having them not showing is no good.
Hope it gets addressed in the near future.
Eagerly awaiting update! Rated 4 out of 5 stars
I can only hope the update for Firefox 3+ comes soon enough. If anyone knows of an alternative add-on please leave your suggestion here.
P.S.: totally agree with Pingouin123's review.
Add-on name needs a revision. Rated 3 out of 5 stars
Can't say anything about the add-on, as I haven't tried it myself, but it could do with a better name. It is entirely unrelated to its function and it should be revised.
I'm guessing it must have something to do with Lola Fernández (mentioned in your site) but I sincerely believe that a more practical, to the point name would draw more users.
(the rating of 3 stars was because I couldn't post this without rating)
P.S. updating your site wouldn't do any harm either.