To try the thousands of add-ons available here, download Mozilla Firefox, a fast, free way to surf the Web!Close
Choose from thousands of extra features and styles to make Firefox your own.Close
|Name||Beck And Call|
|User since||April 1, 2008|
|Number of add-ons developed||0 add-ons|
|Average rating of developer's add-ons||Not yet rated|
I do believe I'll add something more amusing later.
@TheMac5010: That would be a very bad idea. Firefox 3.0 is EoL and insecure. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox#Release_historyThis review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.8.1).
@linopolus: The extension is the source. Download the .XPI and unpack it with any Zip 2.0-compatible archiver. Presto change-o, source.
It's still using MD5, though. I'd look for a hasher that implements SHA1 or (better yet) SHA512. Just in case.
No way to exempt internal addresses from plugin. Tends to break things like the Transmission WebUI. Support forum broken in Firefox.
So glad to see this extension resurrected!This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.77).
Insanely useful, pleasantly tiny.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.1).
Points off for distributing binaries in the XPI. More points off for making the build system depend entirely on Windows (with Cygwin utilities in CVS, even). Really unimpressed, likely to remain that way until this is crufted entirely in XUL and uses Firefox' own NSS library for crypto.
swrdmstr2009: Firefox and XUL add-ons aren't limited to anything. You're using a Win32 build that's limited to 4GB for no obvious reason. ( See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension just for openers.)
Nice A.M.O people: Would be great if binaries-dependent XPIs were clearly labeled, plz.
Huge, ugly (UI-ugly), not exactly a speed demon (on a T9400, 4GB, Ubuntu Jaunty), not real clear on how it works or what it uses to encrypt data (NSS would be nice, since it's sort of *built in* to all Mozilla products), and form filling needs an awful lot of work.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.51.4).
Works as well as you can expect right now. Needs a larger fingerprint database. jtang234: "Bing" is not a "company."This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.6).
Unmaintained and mostly broken.
Excellent work.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.2.8).
Does not do what it says on the tin. See Wladimir's comment farther down.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.1).
WARNING: Anyone following the instructions suggested for enabling AD / TMP compatibility will discover that opening new tabs no longer focuses the address bar on new tab open. This behaviour persists until new tabs are *not* directed to chrome://autodial/content, whether or not AD is installed.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (7.1).
Have to agree with johnspac-- Sage is nice, but I'm using Brief instead because I can keep articles around for a while. There are a lot of high-traffic sites that can easily start dropping entries if I don't look at the feed for a couple hours.This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.0.1).
This is a Java applet; not a Firefox extension. The stub add-on code can't even launch the applet without user intervention, and the application is completely independent of Firefox.
Please remove this listing.
...I've moved on to Shredder. Is a Thunderbird 3.0b/pre support a possibility any time soon?This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.0).
I love the small size and simple functionality. However, I think it's lacking one significant thing: autoHideStatusbar's ability to show auto-restore the status bar when links are hovered or pages are loading. I think that would make this extension just about complete.