Andrew Brunner

About me

Developer Information
Name Andrew Brunner
User since April 25, 2012
Number of add-ons developed 0 add-ons
Average rating of developer's add-ons Not yet rated

My Reviews

Xmarks Sync

No problems here Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I have been using this plugin for sometime now on multiple platforms with no issues. It is also great for SEO reasons.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on ( 

SeoQuake SEO extension

Excellent tool Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent tool for professionals. What I mean by that, anyone that needs the data behind the results of search engines.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on ( 

Print Edit

I can PRINT Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I have always had issues printing to my laser printer. It would crash my system. This fixed it. Excellent!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (8.3.1-signed).  This user has a previous review of this add-on.

Web of Trust, WOT: Website Reputation Ratings

Interesting fight Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Interesting fight between wavefour and mywot. After reading the emails, and watching the video again, it seems pretty clear to me that mywot is lying.

Oh my, after doing a little research, it looks like 'wavefour' is in good company. Here is another site that critized 'mywot'

Some excerpts from that site,

"Update: I must thank MyWot users for perfectly demonstrating my point: it took only 17 hours for Dukeo to get a “Bad Reputation” only based on this article. Now, explain to me why I have a bad “Vendor Reliability” when I am not selling any product? What is the problem with “Privacy” on my site where I don’t even use any cookies? And what about “Child Safety” issues? MyWot is rigged and you just confirmed it, thank you."

And some more regarding 'disclosure' since mywot gave "wavefour' insults for 'finally' revealing who he is (Thomas Prendergast) kudos to you Tom.

"MyWot Users: Anonymity As A Defamation Tool

I’ve been thinking a lot about the fact that MyWot users are completely anonymous, and apparently I am not the only one since they answer this concern in their own faq:

If all ratings were public, users might be reluctant to rate certain sites, because it would reveal to everyone they have actually visited them.

So, if I understand correctly, people do not assume the fact that they visit a website, but they can trash it if they want?"

You guys have no integrity!

Very professional too with your latest attempt to smear Prendergast for his legitimate criticism of your operation.

Your FAQs say that if your not happy with the ratings sign up and get your friends or subscribers to do so as well and rate accordingly. However, it seems, when they do, you call them "spammers"?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (20120302.1-signed). 

Search Engine Security

Looking Rated 3 out of 5 stars

I just want to avoid sites that are confirmed maleware or phishing attacks when searching on Bing, Google, etc. What I mean is a technical detector not a human rating.


Another small piece to the advancement of the Internet Rated 5 out of 5 stars

These small plugins make my Internet integrated involvement a lot easier to manage.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on ( 

Print Edit

Thankyou! Rated 5 out of 5 stars

For years FireFox would crash when I tried to print. I gave up. Your plug not only solved that but has so many other cool features. Edit the page before printing is awesome!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (8.3.1-signed).