Misleading release notes.

Do not blindly, lazily copy-and-paste from one version to the next.

Instead, please publish notes that are meaningful – so that changes to your code can be audited.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/versions/20200101.0wot/updateinfo/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/versions/20200106.0wot/updateinfo/

Captured:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200106234000/https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/versions/20200101.0wot/updateinfo/
https://web.archive.org/web/20200106233948/https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/versions/20200106.0wot/updateinfo/

I like seeing WoT ratings on each link before I click it, but I wish it didn't interfere with rendering web content. For instance, on Facebook, many third-party embedded images are cut off by the WoT extension. I tried adding an exception for Facebook, but it isn't being honored.

Is a "must" for your safe browsing , and if you are an expert please use it to inform others on the spot!

its awesome

Why like the security from WOT service

У данного дополнения очень плохая оптимизация, после его установки появляются тормоза замедляющие всю работу браузера, особенно во время запуска, страницы начинают подтормаживать при скролинге, порой перемещение по странице идет рывками. И всё более усугубляется если у вас открыто много вкладок. Старые версии дополнения работали куда стабильней.
Тhis add-on has very poor optimization, after its installation brakes appear that slow down the entire browser, especially during startup, pages start to slow down when scrolling, sometimes moving around the page goes jerky. And it gets worse if you have a lot of tabs open. Old versions of the add-on worked much more stable.

This would be a useful extension if it were well written. Unfortunately, it isn't. It's uses slow, annoying dialog windows that disappear when they lose focus. The options presented are not well thought out. Etc. Another problem is that the community is irresponsible about what they are reporting, so you can't rely on the ratings. A lot of web sites reported to be "unsafe" are actually perfectly safe sites expressing a legitimate political viewpoint the reviewer disagrees with. On the other hand, many sites that are truly problematic have high ratings because they entice users with something entertaining.

It's one of the add-ons I've been using for the longest time. Its logo works as a led light. It changes color according to the reputation of the site you're visiting, thus warning you of potential threats. Gray means there's no record yet about that site, green means no issue, and so on.
In case of scam or other serious danger, it blocks the page with a banner, which the user may however bypass at his own risk.
Sites' reputation is the result of reports from the surfing community. Clicking on the logo, you can access available details, such as rating, type of threat (scam, adult content, etc.) and users' comments or reviews. By registering you can add your own. As it did, and still does to me, it renders an excellent service to stubborn surfers who tend to be carried away by their mouse.

Thanks for being here for my computer