Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Aleksander
Rated 5 out of 5
by Aleksander, a year ago433 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by indeerya, 2 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Chester, 4 days agoThe creators are openly intersexist and the guidelines for who counts for what are just completely incoherent. At this point it's literally useless.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16773714, 4 days agoThis extension is almost pointless now with how it does not care to actually protect the people it's supposed to be protecting. Letting intracommunity discourse and personal biases get in the way of objective marking. Marking people as anti-trans just because they have opinions the extension makers don't like. Marking allies as pro-trans just because they aren't transphobic, even if they aren't actively fighting for us. Marking people who actively go out of their way to attack and misgender only certain types of trans people, and intersex people, as pro-trans because "it's okay when it's *these* groups because they are bad". I've been using this add-on since 2018, but I don't see much point in having this anymore if it is straying from its initial goals to create useless markings.
- Rated 5 out of 5by nunro, 5 days agoI use this addon to find all the based (red) people! It works great!
- Rated 1 out of 5by Disharm0ny, 9 days agoThis extension has become absolutely useless for most purposes. Perhaps as a transmisogyny detector, however trans women will always be marked green by default, regardless of how horiffically transphobic they are towards other trans people.
The developer has specifically stated that slurs aimed at nonbinary people are acceptable and will not result in a negative rating. It appears slurs and even straight up misgendering and transphobia aimed at transmascs are acceptable too, because everyone I've seen using them repeatedly and stating their hatred for transmascs has been either marked green or occasionally unrated. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16591280, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by TheKreature13666, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by rot, 23 days ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Squidderf, a month agoGreat, but it seems people are abusing it as there is no method to provide context or clues as to why someone has been marked the way they are. I've seen some creators marked incorrectly, or they've been changed multiple times.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17556029, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by yyupo, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by voidei, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ThineCyberCat, 2 months agoPretty good and useful, I think for mobile to add someone as transphobic or trans friendly you should tap and hold
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18564172, 2 months agoGreat concept, usually works however, filters most hyperlinks based on which site it's from rather then the content of a specific url. Also, I feel like most of the filtering works internationally but doesn't work at a national level like for example in the uk, britain first and reform uk (2 very fascist British political parties) aren't listed as either negative or positive and I noticed the same with most political parties in other countries like with the republican party in the US. Ig I just think this is an amazing extension that just needs a lot more work done on it. Btw these problems might mainly to do with search results cus I use the reddit app and I rarely use tumblr and I never use Twitter or Facebook and I've not tested this extension on YouTube or Wikipedia yet tbh.
As a trans woman I really appreciate the extension tho especially how every bbc article is red. I would've really appreciated this before I attended trans pride then realised that they only gave trans pride one sentence the day after and on an article about a fascist protest with 100x less ppl but that's a little side note, dude stop judging me I have adhd and its 1am. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18562871, 2 months agoModeration seems inconsistent, you can almost always trust a red flag but I've had issues with what I'd consider false positives for green flags.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18559131, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by defsiarte, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ambie, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pablo, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Meow, 3 months agoHi, I'm transfemme. "Theyfab" is an anti-trans slur and we should not play into patriarchal transmisia by not treating it as such. I'll change my review if you fix this. I'm friends with many people affected by this slur and it's silly and divisive to not treat it as such. Trans people don't all hate each other because we came from different backgrounds and have different genders- that's just overemphasized internet drama, not real life. I gave all my old masculine clothes to a friend affected by this slur, and I don't feel comfortable not treating it as a slur. A word that bioessentializes someone's AGAB as their gender is absolutely the definition of transphobia and constitutes a slur. This is like basic transfeminism 101.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Crunk, 3 months agomade a guide to say its okay to use a slur that misgenders enby people, good job everyone /s
- Rated 1 out of 5by Hee-Ho-Kun, 3 months agoThe moderators have begun marking trans people as transphobic for specific stances on intra-community issues; this extension is now useless because of that.
- Rated 1 out of 5by KozaBerserker, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ray Bluesock, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Zoey Cakes, 3 months agogreat for showing which creators to support and companys <3 fantastic :3 trans rights are human rights