以前挺好用的，现在火狐浏览器升级后无法使用了，显示：不兼容 Firefox Quantum
Great extension. I use it all the time. Please please, make a Web Extensions version because I don't know what I will do without this in Firefox 57
Fantastic and very useful extension. Please update it to firefox quantum.
velocissimo e intuitivo
Please give us an update for Mozilla Quantum
update for suppot firefox 57 please
please update this addon to make it compatible with Firefox Quantum version 57 (WebExtension)
Thank you !
Permet de stocker des pages utiles, celles d'un manuel par exemple.
disabled auto-update a month ago, biggest reason was this nifty and useful addon sadly does not work on 57 and I didn't want any surprise updates that would render this addon unusable.
쉽게 웹 페이지를 저장한다.
그러나 파이어폭스가 나도 모르게... 갑자기 업그레이드 되었고, 지금 스크랩북은 사용할 수 없다.
저장한 자료를 다시 볼 수가 없어 난감하다.
Pero actualicé a Quantum y ahora desapareció, please update!!!
hope it will be updated for Firefox 57
I use scrapbook to keep track of everything . Scrapbook helps be orderly. I noticed that Firefox had an update called Firefox Quantum. I decided not to update right away up until I got some questions answered . Its to late I restarted my mac book pro to solve a problem . When the reboot finished there I was with Firfox quantum and ABSOLUTELY no Scrapbook. I can do anything find anything save anything etc. I am completely Effed,Effed , Effed, ad infitium. What can I do ? Can I can get Firefox 56.02 back , and then wait for fixes.
? I relied on scrapbook to help me run my life more smoothly. I was Shanghaid. Please send some hopeful nes or solution.
thank you Gene Winberry
emai firstname.lastname@example.org or Chris @ winberry.net
hope it will be updated for Firefox 57
Because of it being comprehensive.
PLEASE BRING QUANTUM UP TO DATE
pse reniew it for QUANTUM
Scrapbook is the only add-on I can't afford to lose, and still the only one incompatible with Quantum. Now several websites are non-functional and prompting me to upgrade Ff. Why no response from Gomita? It is so frustrating to have used and supported Sb FOR OVER A DECADE and be left hanging like this. I cannot lose this functionality or years of data, but it's becoming obvious I can't use this older Ff forever either. GOMITA PLEASE respond to this issue.
I use scrapbook extensively and have built my personal resource library using it. I have a massive collection of stuff I enjoy collecting. I can't imagine not being able to use all this as the new Firefox rolls out. I'll be switching the the ESR to buy some time. I sure hope the add-on is made to work with it.
Some of the things I like most about scrapbook are:
- that I can save the individual part of a web page I'm interested in or the whole page;
- that I can link a file to the record and make highlights and add a note i.e. when I find info that includes a downloaded pdf or image, I can link it to the record
- that I can use the dom eraser to clean up the page of useless stuff and make a clean, more readable, printable item;
- that I can save a bunch of snips and then join them into one item,
- that I can have multiple "subject" scrapbooks and import/export between them,
- that sorting is fast,
- that indexing and search is fast
I could go on but basically, the only reason I use the Firefox browser is so I can have the Firefox add-on.
Как без него жить дальше? ведь с Квантумом он не совместим а альтернативы пока не нашёл...придётся не обновлять браузер
Under "Scrapbook X" you have the link to Web Scrapbook (beta) working with FF Quantum.
Will you please update Scrapbook to Firefox Quantum
I can't work no more with Firefox without Scrapbook
Trying FF Quantum since this morning. Night and day. Incredible better memory management and way faster but..... Scrapbook not compatible. Over 25Go of data unavailable. Gosh I need this plugin to work!
Scrapbook is an awesome plugin!
I'm not sure what the previous reviewer has seen exactly, but I can't see any such byte string at the or anywhere in the files I've downloaded (in index.html at least).
I wish they had provided more information. Until then, I'm assuming they're infected with malware and the malware is doing this as I can't reproduce on my machine and it wouldn't really be easy for an extension published to the AMO to do something like this and get away with it.
If you _do_ see something like what they reported and can provide details, please do. Until then, I'm assuming this is a misidentification of the cause on their part.