Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
115 reviews
- Rated 2 out of 5by || BeeBee ||, 3 years agoI was so very happy using the previous version (5 star in my point of view), but latest resets itself every time I close Firefox rendering it undesired/not-needed on my pc's. I have to do every script acceptance over and over for every site I'm visiting ... so no good worth max 2 stars.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Peter Topfzerschlächter, 4 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 16331265, 4 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by MSpan, 4 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by PAnzER, 4 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15751646, 5 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15695407, 5 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15255162, 5 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15186823, 5 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Georg Fröhlich, 5 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13036312, 6 years agoThis add on does its job but it has one major flaw, in that it will regularly forget its settings, especially if you install FireFox on a new computer and it links back to your older set ups.
It often forgets that I have allowed sites access and blocks things randomly.. It is very frustrating at times. I like it, I will keep using it (for now) but if it keeps forgetting settings and I have to remind it to unblock sites regularly going forward, I am going to drop this. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 14169924, 6 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by mono-k, 6 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 12944590, 7 years agoLa nuova interfaccia è inutilizzabile, domini e sottodomini mischiati in una unica lista illeggibile (ci sono siti con 30-40 elementi da rivedere), segnalazioni di elementi bloccati anche se tutti i domini top level sono autorizzati trusted senza esclusione di elementi, insomma una gran confusione.
Inoltre inutile postare link a FAQ e forum come risposta alle recensioni critiche. Una estensione del genere deve essere immediatamente comprensibile e utilizzabile come infatti lo era la precedente interfaccia, se non lo è non è colpa degli utenti. Come dir, ambasciator non porta pena :) Auguri e complimenti comunque per l'ottimo lavoro in tutti questi anni. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13375527, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13743770, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by binaural, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13609182, 7 years agoこのアドオンは確かに素晴らしい機能を持っています。
しかし最新版になってからは、非常にサイトの読み込みが遅くなりました。
アドオンを無効にしたら、とても快適にブラウジング出来ています。
この現象が解消されないかぎり、私はこのアドオンを使うことはないでしょう。 - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13606096, 7 years agoGood concept, but it doesn't save the state you select for a site. It keeps blocking Javascript on Facebook even after I enable it.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13605210, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by steppenwolf, 7 years agoLa última versión es tan incómoda de usar que la he quitado.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Simón, 7 years agoPlease, explain in the add-on description why does NoScript now ask for a new permission to "download files and read and modify the browser's download history".
Besides, the new UI quite sucks, but the rules list semi-transparency seems to be what makes the NoScript Settings page sluggish.Developer response
posted 7 years agohttps://hackademix.net/2017/12/11/noscript-and-the-downloads-permission/ - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13584274, 7 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Azarilh, 7 years agoWhoa, this new version is great! Jus' like 2 girls 1 cup!
PS: Why NoScript need to read the download history now? LOL
———
EDIT: Ok, that's fine. Thank you for the reply. Still, the new version is unfriendly, like others say too.
———
EDIT after 2 years i tried it again: UI still sucks, my rating remains 2/5. Too bad.Developer response
posted 7 years agoUnlike "legacy" add-ons, WebExtensions cannot interact with your filesystem directly. The restored "Export" feature actually goes through the browser.downloads API to let you save your configuration locally.