Reviews for Evernote Web Clipper
Evernote Web Clipper by Evernote
145 reviews
- by Firefox user 14169946, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13608986, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14108472, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5Evernote Web Clipper is a really useful add-on, which enables me to quickly capture details from a webpage. Having tried a few other notes apps, I haven't found any with functions that compare well with the Web Clipper. It doesn't always capture the information I'm expecting, but for ease of use it's well ahead of other similar apps.
- by OJOKVE, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by 小名, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13384716, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by 85pepola, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 7752248, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5Works as represented. I've been a (paid) Evernote user since 2011. Overall, Evernote is a great product. You should really purchase their service (rather than use it for free) if you love it, so that they will have the resources and inclination to keep Evernote going.
I'd give this application five stars if it was somewhat better at simplifying HTML pages when clipping them. There are frequent inaccuracies that I work-around by sending the page first to Instapaper (occasionally Pocket), then to Evernote. The old "Clearly" application worked better.
It would be great if the company spent a little more time making applications that are essential to the basic service work perfectly, with full features--and a little less building sharing and other business gadgets that don't work that well at all.
Yes, I'd happily pay extra for a web clipper that was fully functioned and worked consistently. - by Firefox user 13931420, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13859927, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13854738, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5Please can you get the Gmail clipping feature to work again, as it currently only turns up a blank clipped email? This seems to keep breaking every so often.
- by LaurenceMAD87, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13787515, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13758113, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by andysmart, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13746047, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13734010, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13728509, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5