- by Firefox user 13923710, 4 years agoRated 4 out of 5While this has made citation much easier, I wish the DOI would work consistently. I often have to go back and add information because dynamic citations aren't populating.
Developer responseposted 4 years agoThanks.
Unfortunately, websites change from time to time, breaking some of the site adjusters (there is no big team behind this, so I cannot follow every change happening out there at the publisher's websites). I am currently in a control pass on dynamic citation functionality. You can always suggest/report websites to me that aren't working properly, and I see to it as soon as real life work permits. Go to the github or just contact me by email if you wish.
- by FirefoxIStheBest.Ever., 4 years agoRated 5 out of 5It just works, I like it. For most things I can retrieve the citation correctly and maybe just fix the published date for websites. There was a typo in the citation that the dev managed to fix ultra fast, so yea, solid 5/5.
Developer responseposted 4 years agoThanks, the typo will be fixed in 0.78. The date is put to access date whenever it does not find the date using its fixed default search kernel, which is optimized towards journal abstract pages. For security reasons, I keep this default kernel to a bare minimum (I don't want to read any kind of hidden and possibly malicious html source)